GeForce 8800 GS vs Mobility Radeon

Aggregated performance score

ATI Mobility
2001
16 MB DDR
1.33
+56.5%

Mobility Radeon outperforms GeForce 8800 GS by 56% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking9771090
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money0.020.01
ArchitectureRage 6 (2000−2007)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameM6G92
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 December 2001 (22 years ago)31 January 2008 (16 years ago)
Current price$202 $145

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

ATI Mobility has 100% better value for money than 8800 GS.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data96
Core clock speed144 MHz550 MHz
Number of transistors30 million754 million
Manufacturing process technology180 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data105 Watt
Texture fill rate0.4326.40
Floating-point performanceno data264 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 1.0 x16
Lengthno data229 mm
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR3
Maximum RAM amount16 MB384 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed288 MHz1600 MHz
Memory bandwidth2.304 GB/s38.4 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.011.1 (10_0)
Shader Modelno data4.0
OpenGL1.33.3
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDAno data1.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 1.33 0.85
Recency 1 December 2001 31 January 2008
Maximum RAM amount 16 MB 384 MB
Chip lithography 180 nm 65 nm

The Mobility Radeon is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8800 GS in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Mobility Radeon
Mobility Radeon
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GS
GeForce 8800 GS

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Mobility Radeon on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 52 votes

Rate GeForce 8800 GS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.