GeForce 8800 GT vs Mobility Radeon
Aggregated performance score
Mobility Radeon outperforms GeForce 8800 GT by 8% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | 979 | 999 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.02 | 0.02 |
| Architecture | Rage 6 (2000−2007) | Tesla (2006−2010) |
| GPU code name | M6 | G92 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Release date | 1 December 2001 (22 years ago) | 29 October 2007 (16 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $349 |
| Current price | $202 | $166 (0.5x MSRP) |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
ATI Mobility and 8800 GT have a nearly equal value for money.
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | no data | 112 |
| CUDA cores | no data | 112 |
| Core clock speed | 144 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 30 million | 754 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 180 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 105 Watt |
| Maximum GPU temperature | no data | 105 °C |
| Texture fill rate | 0.43 | 33.6 billion/sec |
| Floating-point performance | no data | 336.0 gflops |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Bus support | no data | PCI-E 2.0 |
| Interface | AGP 4x | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 9" (22.9 cm) |
| Height | no data | Single Slot |
| Width | IGP | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | 6-pin & 8-pin |
| SLI options | no data | 2-way |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | DDR | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 MB | 512 MB |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 288 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 2.304 GB/s | 57.6 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | Dual Link DVIHDTV |
| Multi monitor support | no data | + |
| Maximum VGA resolution | no data | 2048x1536 |
| Audio input for HDMI | no data | S/PDIF |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | no data | 128bit |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 7.0 | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | no data | 4.0 |
| OpenGL | 1.3 | 2.1 |
| OpenCL | N/A | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | no data | + |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.34 | 1.24 |
| Recency | 1 December 2001 | 29 October 2007 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 MB | 512 MB |
| Chip lithography | 180 nm | 65 nm |
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Mobility Radeon and GeForce 8800 GT.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
