GeForce 8800 GS vs ATI Radeon HD 3850 X2

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 3850 X2 and GeForce 8800 GS, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

ATI HD 3850 X2
2008
512 MB GDDR3, 140 Watt
2.13
+148%

ATI HD 3850 X2 outperforms 8800 GS by a whopping 148% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking8681133
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.09no data
Power efficiency1.040.56
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameRV670G92
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date4 April 2008 (16 years ago)31 January 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$349 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32096
Core clock speed669 MHz550 MHz
Number of transistors666 million754 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)140 Watt105 Watt
Texture fill rate10.7026.40
Floating-point processing power0.4282 TFLOPS0.264 TFLOPS
ROPs1612
TMUs1648

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length267 mm229 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount512 MB384 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed828 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth52.99 GB/s38.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model4.14.0
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-1.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

ATI HD 3850 X2 2.13
+148%
8800 GS 0.86

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI HD 3850 X2 822
+149%
8800 GS 330

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.13 0.86
Recency 4 April 2008 31 January 2008
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 384 MB
Chip lithography 55 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 140 Watt 105 Watt

ATI HD 3850 X2 has a 147.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 months, a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 18.2% more advanced lithography process.

8800 GS, on the other hand, has 33.3% lower power consumption.

The Radeon HD 3850 X2 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8800 GS in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 3850 X2
Radeon HD 3850 X2
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GS
GeForce 8800 GS

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 6 votes

Rate Radeon HD 3850 X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 57 votes

Rate GeForce 8800 GS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.