GeForce MX450 vs Mobility Radeon HD 5870 Crossfire
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Mobility Radeon HD 5870 Crossfire and GeForce MX450, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
GeForce MX450 outperforms ATI Mobility HD 5870 Crossfire by an impressive 99% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | 604 | 428 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | Terascale 2 (2009−2015) | Turing (2018−2021) |
| GPU code name | Broadway-XT | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 7 January 2010 (14 years ago) | 1 August 2020 (3 years ago) |
| Current price | $56 | no data |
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1600 | 896 |
| Core clock speed | 700 MHz | 1395 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1575 MHz |
| Number of transistors | no data | 4,700 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 12 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 120 Watt | 25 Watt (12 - 29 Watt TGP) |
| Texture fill rate | no data | 100.8 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on Mobility Radeon HD 5870 Crossfire and GeForce MX450 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
| Laptop size | large | no data |
| Interface | no data | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | DDR3, GDDR3, GDDR5 | GDDR5, GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2x1 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | 10000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 64.03 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | no data | No outputs |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Optimus | no data | + |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 11 | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | no data | 6.5 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | no data | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | no data | 1.2 |
| CUDA | no data | 7.5 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
GeForce MX450 outperforms Mobility Radeon HD 5870 Crossfire by 99% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
3DMark Vantage Performance
3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
GeForce MX450 outperforms Mobility Radeon HD 5870 Crossfire by 75% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| 900p | 53
−88.7%
| 100−110
+88.7%
|
| Full HD | 51
+75.9%
| 29
−75.9%
|
| 1440p | 8−9
−113%
| 17
+113%
|
| 4K | 12−14
−100%
| 24
+100%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 8−9
−300%
|
32
+300%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 10−11
−100%
|
20−22
+100%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 4−5
−150%
|
10
+150%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 12−14
−150%
|
30−33
+150%
|
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 10−12
−81.8%
|
20−22
+81.8%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 8−9
−175%
|
22
+175%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 10−11
−120%
|
21−24
+120%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 14−16
−92.9%
|
27−30
+92.9%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 21−24
−104%
|
45−50
+104%
|
| Hitman 3 | 9−10
−233%
|
30
+233%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 24−27
−124%
|
56
+124%
|
| Metro Exodus | 9−10
−511%
|
55
+511%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 12−14
−246%
|
45
+246%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 16−18
−194%
|
50
+194%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 21−24
−13.6%
|
25
+13.6%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 10−11
−100%
|
20−22
+100%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 4−5
−50%
|
6
+50%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 12−14
−150%
|
30−33
+150%
|
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 10−12
−81.8%
|
20−22
+81.8%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 8−9
−62.5%
|
13
+62.5%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 10−11
−120%
|
21−24
+120%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 14−16
−92.9%
|
27−30
+92.9%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 21−24
−104%
|
45−50
+104%
|
| Hitman 3 | 9−10
−122%
|
20
+122%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 24−27
−64%
|
40−45
+64%
|
| Metro Exodus | 9−10
−267%
|
33
+267%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 12−14
−169%
|
35
+169%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 16−18
−135%
|
40
+135%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 10−12
−200%
|
33
+200%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 21−24
−305%
|
89
+305%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 10−11
−100%
|
20−22
+100%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 4−5
−175%
|
11
+175%
|
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 10−12
−81.8%
|
20−22
+81.8%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 8−9
+0%
|
8
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 10−11
−120%
|
21−24
+120%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 21−24
−104%
|
45−50
+104%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 24−27
+4.2%
|
24
−4.2%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 16−18
−76.5%
|
30
+76.5%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 10−12
−81.8%
|
20
+81.8%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 21−24
+214%
|
7
−214%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 12−14
−138%
|
31
+138%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 9−10
−111%
|
18−20
+111%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 7−8
−129%
|
16−18
+129%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 4−5
−125%
|
9−10
+125%
|
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 7−8
−71.4%
|
12−14
+71.4%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−150%
|
5−6
+150%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 7−8
−186%
|
20
+186%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 8−9
−125%
|
18−20
+125%
|
| Hitman 3 | 9−10
−100%
|
18
+100%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 10−12
−81.8%
|
20−22
+81.8%
|
| Metro Exodus | 2−3
−600%
|
14−16
+600%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 4−5
−125%
|
9−10
+125%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 2−3
−150%
|
5
+150%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 9−10
−189%
|
26
+189%
|
4K
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 3−4
−200%
|
9−10
+200%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 3−4
−133%
|
7−8
+133%
|
| Hitman 3 | 1−2
−500%
|
6−7
+500%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 5−6
−100%
|
10−11
+100%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 1−2
−400%
|
5−6
+400%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 1−2
−600%
|
7−8
+600%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 3−4
−100%
|
6−7
+100%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 2−3
−100%
|
4−5
+100%
|
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 2−3
−100%
|
4−5
+100%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| Far Cry 5 | 2−3
−150%
|
5−6
+150%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 4−5
−200%
|
12−14
+200%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 5−6
−100%
|
10−11
+100%
|
| Metro Exodus | 6−7
−66.7%
|
10−11
+66.7%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 1−2
−200%
|
3−4
+200%
|
4K
Epic Preset
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 5−6
−80%
|
9−10
+80%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 3−4
−133%
|
7
+133%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 9−10
−100%
|
18
+100%
|
This is how ATI Mobility HD 5870 Crossfire and GeForce MX450 compete in popular games:
- GeForce MX450 is 89% faster in 900p
- ATI Mobility HD 5870 Crossfire is 76% faster in 1080p
- GeForce MX450 is 113% faster in 1440p
- GeForce MX450 is 100% faster in 4K
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the ATI Mobility HD 5870 Crossfire is 214% faster.
- in Metro Exodus, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GeForce MX450 is 600% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- ATI Mobility HD 5870 Crossfire is ahead in 2 tests (3%)
- GeForce MX450 is ahead in 66 tests (96%)
- there's a draw in 1 test (1%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 4.87 | 9.67 |
| Recency | 7 January 2010 | 1 August 2020 |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 12 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 120 Watt | 25 Watt |
The GeForce MX450 is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 5870 Crossfire in performance tests.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
