GeForce RTX 4090 vs Mobility Radeon HD 5650

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

ATI Mobility HD 5650
2010
1024 MB GDDR3, DDR3
1.36

GeForce RTX 4090 outperforms Mobility Radeon HD 5650 by 7253% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking9681
Place by popularitynot in top-1007
Value for moneyno data10.78
ArchitectureTerascale 2 (2009−2015)Ada Lovelace
GPU code nameMadison ProAD102-300-A1
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date7 January 2010 (14 years old)20 September 2022 (1 year old)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,599
Current price$24 $1756 (1.1x MSRP)
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40016384
Core clock speed450 MHz2235 MHz
Boost clock speed650 MHz2520 MHz
Number of transistors627 million76,300 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15-19 Watt450 Watt
Texture fill rate9.0001,290
Floating-point performance360.0 gflopsno data

Size and compatibility

Information on Mobility Radeon HD 5650 and GeForce RTX 4090 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data304 mm
Widthno data3-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3, DDR3GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount1 GB24 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz21000 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s1,008 GB/s
Shared memory--

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMIno data+

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.6
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.23.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDAno data8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

ATI Mobility HD 5650 1.36
RTX 4090 100.00
+7253%

GeForce RTX 4090 outperforms Mobility Radeon HD 5650 by 7253% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

ATI Mobility HD 5650 3188
RTX 4090 137170
+4203%

GeForce RTX 4090 outperforms Mobility Radeon HD 5650 by 4203% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

ATI Mobility HD 5650 856
RTX 4090 104937
+12166%

GeForce RTX 4090 outperforms Mobility Radeon HD 5650 by 12166% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

ATI Mobility HD 5650 730
RTX 4090 73174
+9924%

GeForce RTX 4090 outperforms Mobility Radeon HD 5650 by 9924% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

ATI Mobility HD 5650 6036
RTX 4090 250667
+4053%

GeForce RTX 4090 outperforms Mobility Radeon HD 5650 by 4053% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p15
−7233%
1100−1150
+7233%
Full HD16
−1556%
265
+1556%
1440p2−3
−10500%
212
+10500%
4K2−3
−7400%
150
+7400%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−5525%
225
+5525%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 235
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
−1878%
170−180
+1878%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−5450%
222
+5450%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−31100%
300−350
+31100%
Hitman 3 2−3
−10850%
210−220
+10850%
Horizon Zero Dawn 1−2
−27400%
275
+27400%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−4450%
180−190
+4450%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−4100%
294
+4100%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 221
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
−1878%
170−180
+1878%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−5250%
214
+5250%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−31100%
300−350
+31100%
Hitman 3 2−3
−10850%
210−220
+10850%
Horizon Zero Dawn 1−2
−24900%
250
+24900%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−11200%
226
+11200%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−4450%
180−190
+4450%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−4014%
288
+4014%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−14225%
573
+14225%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 179
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−5150%
210
+5150%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−31100%
300−350
+31100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−7525%
305
+7525%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−4867%
140−150
+4867%
Hitman 3 4−5
−5225%
210−220
+5225%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−2863%
237
+2863%
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 90−95
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6
−5320%
271
+5320%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−15300%
154
+15300%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−9200%
186
+9200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−13300%
268
+13300%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−4700%
95−100
+4700%
Hitman 3 1−2
−12700%
120−130
+12700%
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8
−2571%
187
+2571%
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 60−65

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 120
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 120
Far Cry 5 3−4
−5667%
173
+5667%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−2800%
145
+2800%

This is how ATI Mobility HD 5650 and RTX 4090 compete in popular games:

900p resolution:

  • RTX 4090 is 7233% faster than ATI Mobility HD 5650

1080p resolution:

  • RTX 4090 is 1556% faster than ATI Mobility HD 5650

1440p resolution:

  • RTX 4090 is 10500% faster than ATI Mobility HD 5650

4K resolution:

  • RTX 4090 is 7400% faster than ATI Mobility HD 5650

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RTX 4090 is 31100% faster than the ATI Mobility HD 5650.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RTX 4090 surpassed ATI Mobility HD 5650 in all 32 of our tests.

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 1.36 100.00
Recency 7 January 2010 20 September 2022
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 24 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 450 Watt

The GeForce RTX 4090 is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 5650 in performance tests.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon HD 5650 is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 4090 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5650
Mobility Radeon HD 5650
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
GeForce RTX 4090

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 239 votes

Rate ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 10990 votes

Rate NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.