Radeon HD 5850 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7
Aggregated performance score
Iris Xe Graphics G7 outperforms Radeon HD 5850 by 108% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Primary Details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | 394 | 584 |
| Place by popularity | 16 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation | no data | 0.79 |
| Architecture | Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) | Terascale 2 (2009−2015) |
| GPU code name | Tiger Lake Xe | Cypress |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 15 August 2020 (3 years ago) | 30 September 2009 (14 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $299 |
| Current price | no data | $120 (0.4x MSRP) |
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Detailed Specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 96 | 1440 |
| Core clock speed | no data | 725 MHz |
| Number of transistors | no data | 2,154 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 151 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | no data | 52.20 |
| Floating-point performance | no data | 2,088.0 gflops |
Form Factor & Compatibility
Information on Iris Xe Graphics G7 and Radeon HD 5850 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
| Interface | no data | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 241 mm |
| Width | no data | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | 2x 6-pin |
| Memory type | DDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | no data | 1 GB |
| Memory bus width | no data | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | no data | 2000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 128.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | + | no data |
Connectivity and Outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | no data | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| HDMI | no data | + |
Supported Technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Quick Sync | + | no data |
API Compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | DirectX 12_1 | 11.2 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | no data | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | no data | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | no data | N/A |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Iris Xe Graphics G7 outperforms Radeon HD 5850 by 108% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
Iris Xe Graphics G7 outperforms Radeon HD 5850 by 97% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| 900p | 120−130
+103%
| 59
−103%
|
| Full HD | 110−120
+93%
| 57
−93%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 21−24
+120%
|
10−11
−120%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 35−40
+140%
|
14−16
−140%
|
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 27−30
+75%
|
16−18
−75%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 27−30
+145%
|
10−12
−145%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 27−30
+164%
|
10−12
−164%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 35−40
+124%
|
16−18
−124%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 21−24
+120%
|
10−11
−120%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 18−20
+80%
|
10−11
−80%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 21−24
+76.9%
|
12−14
−76.9%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 21−24
+120%
|
10−11
−120%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 35−40
+140%
|
14−16
−140%
|
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 27−30
+75%
|
16−18
−75%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 27−30
+145%
|
10−12
−145%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 27−30
+164%
|
10−12
−164%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 35−40
+124%
|
16−18
−124%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 21−24
+120%
|
10−11
−120%
|
| Metro Exodus | 16−18
+129%
|
7−8
−129%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 18−20
+80%
|
10−11
−80%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 21−24
+76.9%
|
12−14
−76.9%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 21−24
+100%
|
10−12
−100%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 21−24
+120%
|
10−11
−120%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 35−40
+140%
|
14−16
−140%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 27−30
+145%
|
10−12
−145%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 27−30
+164%
|
10−12
−164%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 35−40
+124%
|
16−18
−124%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 21−24
+100%
|
10−12
−100%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 14−16
+87.5%
|
8−9
−87.5%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 16−18
+45.5%
|
10−12
−45.5%
|
| Metro Exodus | 9−10
+200%
|
3−4
−200%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 7−8
+133%
|
3−4
−133%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 14−16
+75%
|
8−9
−75%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 10−11
+233%
|
3−4
−233%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 18−20
+1800%
|
1−2
−1800%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 16−18
+113%
|
8−9
−113%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 18−20
+260%
|
5−6
−260%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 20−22
+186%
|
7−8
−186%
|
4K
High Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 7−8
+75%
|
4−5
−75%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 9−10
+12.5%
|
8−9
−12.5%
|
| Metro Exodus | 4−5
+300%
|
1−2
−300%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 6−7
+100%
|
3−4
−100%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 6−7
+500%
|
1−2
−500%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 8−9
+700%
|
1−2
−700%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 6−7
+100%
|
3−4
−100%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 9−10
+125%
|
4−5
−125%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 9−10
+80%
|
5−6
−80%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 10−12
+57.1%
|
7−8
−57.1%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 14−16
+367%
|
3−4
−367%
|
This is how Iris Xe Graphics G7 and ATI HD 5850 compete in popular games:
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 is 103% faster than ATI HD 5850 in 900p
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 is 93% faster than ATI HD 5850 in 1080p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Battlefield 5, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Iris Xe Graphics G7 is 1800% faster than the ATI HD 5850.
All in all, in popular games:
- Without exception, Iris Xe Graphics G7 surpassed ATI HD 5850 in all 45 of our tests.
Pros & Cons Summary
| Performance score | 10.67 | 5.14 |
| Recency | 15 August 2020 | 30 September 2009 |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 40 nm |
The Iris Xe Graphics G7 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 5850 in performance tests.
Be aware that Iris Xe Graphics G7 is a notebook card while Radeon HD 5850 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with Similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
