GeForce GTX 260M SLI vs Iris Xe Graphics G7

Place in performance ranking	397	711
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	0.93
Architecture	Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)	G9x (2007−2010)
GPU code name	Tiger Lake Xe	NB9E-GTX
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	15 August 2020 (3 years ago)	2 March 2009 (15 years ago)
Current price	no data	$149

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	96	224
Core clock speed	no data	550 MHz
Number of transistors	no data	1508 Million
Manufacturing process technology	10 nm	55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	150 Watt

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Iris Xe Graphics G7 and GeForce GTX 260M SLI compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size

no data

large

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR4	GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount	no data	2 GB
Memory bus width	no data	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	no data	950 MHz
Shared memory	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	DirectX 12_1	10
CUDA	no data	+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	no data
Battlefield 5	0−1	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	no data
Far Cry 5	0−1	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	0−1	no data
Forza Horizon 4	0−1	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	0−1	no data
Red Dead Redemption 2	0−1	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	0−1	no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	no data
Battlefield 5	0−1	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	no data
Far Cry 5	0−1	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	0−1	no data
Forza Horizon 4	0−1	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	0−1	no data
Metro Exodus	0−1	no data
Red Dead Redemption 2	0−1	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	0−1	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	0−1	no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	no data
Battlefield 5	110−120 +224%	30−35 −224%
Far Cry 5	0−1	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	100−105 +233%	30−33 −233%
Forza Horizon 4	0−1	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	0−1	no data

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	40−45 +208%	12−14 −208%
Horizon Zero Dawn	70−75 +218%	21−24 −218%
Metro Exodus	50−55 +213%	16−18 −213%
Red Dead Redemption 2	60−65 +233%	18−20 −233%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	50−55 +233%	14−16 −233%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	no data
Battlefield 5	70−75 +233%	21−24 −233%
Far Cry 5	0−1	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	60−65 +233%	18−20 −233%
Forza Horizon 4	0−1	no data

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18 +220%	5−6 −220%
Horizon Zero Dawn	0−1	no data
Metro Exodus	35−40 +218%	10−12 −218%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−33 +200%	10−11 −200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	18−20 +200%	6−7 −200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 +200%	8−9 −200%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	no data
Battlefield 5	30−33 +200%	10−11 −200%
Far Cry 5	0−1	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 +200%	8−9 −200%
Forza Horizon 4	0−1	no data

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

6−7
+500%

1−2

−500%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
Hitman 3	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
Metro Exodus	1−2	0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion	16−18 +240%	5−6 −240%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
Hitman 3	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
Watch Dogs: Legion	16−18 +240%	5−6 −240%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8 +250%	2−3 −250%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
Horizon Zero Dawn	20−22 +300%	5−6 −300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 +333%	3−4 −333%
Watch Dogs: Legion	16−18 +240%	5−6 −240%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

8−9
+300%

2−3

−300%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Far Cry New Dawn	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3	0−1
Hitman 3	8−9 +300%	2−3 −300%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 +300%	2−3 −300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3	0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2	0−1

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

7−8
+250%

2−3

−250%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2	0−1
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3	0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	3−4	0−1
Metro Exodus	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2	0−1