Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs vs Iris Pro Graphics 6200

Aggregate performance score

Iris Pro Graphics 6200
2015
15 Watt
3.91

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs outperforms Iris Pro Graphics 6200 by an impressive 94% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking662496
Place by popularitynot in top-10068
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.34no data
ArchitectureGen. 8 Broadwell (2014−2015)Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code nameBroadwell GT3eTiger Lake Xe
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date2 June 2015 (9 years ago)15 August 2020 (3 years ago)
Current price$645 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4880
Core clock speed300 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed1150 MHz1350 MHz
Number of transistors189 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rate40.80no data
Floating-point performance883.2 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x1no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem Sharedno data
Maximum RAM amountSystem Sharedno data
Memory bus widtheDRAM + 64/128 Bitno data
Memory clock speedSystem Sharedno data
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync++

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12_1
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.4no data
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.1.80no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Iris Pro Graphics 6200 3.91
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs 7.59
+94.1%

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs outperforms Iris Pro Graphics 6200 by 94% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Iris Pro Graphics 6200 2766
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs 5310
+92%

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs outperforms Iris Pro Graphics 6200 by 92% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Iris Pro Graphics 6200 1737
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs 3987
+130%

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs outperforms Iris Pro Graphics 6200 by 130% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Iris Pro Graphics 6200 15388
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs 21818
+41.8%

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs outperforms Iris Pro Graphics 6200 by 42% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD9−10
−111%
19
+111%
1440p5−6
−100%
10
+100%
4K7−8
−114%
15
+114%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−100%
14
+100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
−114%
14−16
+114%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−850%
19
+850%
Battlefield 5 9−10
−144%
21−24
+144%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
−77.8%
16−18
+77.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−85.7%
13
+85.7%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−64.3%
21−24
+64.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10
−122%
20−22
+122%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−92.9%
27−30
+92.9%
Hitman 3 9−10
−211%
28
+211%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
−77.8%
32
+77.8%
Metro Exodus 7−8
−443%
38
+443%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
−110%
21−24
+110%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
−114%
30
+114%
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
−220%
16
+220%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
−114%
14−16
+114%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−700%
16
+700%
Battlefield 5 9−10
−144%
21−24
+144%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
−77.8%
16−18
+77.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−42.9%
10
+42.9%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−85.7%
26
+85.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10
−33.3%
12
+33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−92.9%
27−30
+92.9%
Hitman 3 9−10
−77.8%
16
+77.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
−44.4%
26
+44.4%
Metro Exodus 7−8
−257%
25
+257%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
−110%
21−24
+110%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
−50%
21
+50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−144%
22
+144%
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
−180%
14
+180%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
−114%
14−16
+114%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
−77.8%
16−18
+77.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−14.3%
8
+14.3%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−64.3%
21−24
+64.3%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−92.9%
27−30
+92.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
+12.5%
16
−12.5%
Metro Exodus 7−8
−214%
22
+214%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−22.2%
11
+22.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
−140%
12−14
+140%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
−110%
21−24
+110%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8
−114%
14−16
+114%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−140%
12−14
+140%
Hitman 3 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−50%
9−10
+50%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−100%
12
+100%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−133%
14−16
+133%
Horizon Zero Dawn 9−10
−77.8%
16−18
+77.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−150%
10
+150%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5 12−14
−41.7%
17
+41.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%
Hitman 3 0−1 4−5
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
−100%
8−9
+100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 1−2
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
−100%
8−9
+100%
Metro Exodus 6−7
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%

This is how Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs compete in popular games:

  • Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is 111% faster in 1080p
  • Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is 100% faster in 1440p
  • Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is 114% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is 13% faster.
  • in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is 850% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is ahead in 1 test (2%)
  • Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is ahead in 64 tests (98%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.91 7.59
Recency 2 June 2015 15 August 2020
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 28 Watt

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 80 votes

Rate Iris Pro Graphics 6200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 815 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.