Radeon R7 M380 vs Iris Plus Graphics 655

Place in the ranking	665	679
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	20.62	no data
Architecture	Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)	GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)
GPU code name	Coffee Lake GT3e	Tropo
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	3 April 2018 (6 years ago)	5 May 2015 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	640
Compute units	no data	10
Core clock speed	300 MHz	900 MHz
Boost clock speed	1050 MHz	915 MHz
Number of transistors	189 million	1,500 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm+++	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	no data
Texture fill rate	50.40	36.60
Floating-point processing power	0.8064 TFLOPS	1.171 TFLOPS
ROPs	6	16
TMUs	48	40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Bus support	no data	PCIe 3.0
Interface	Ring Bus	PCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	4 GB
Memory bus width	System Shared	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	32 GB/s
Shared memory	+	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	Portable Device Dependent	No outputs
Eyefinity	-	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration	-	+
FreeSync	-	+
HD3D	-	+
PowerTune	-	+
DualGraphics	-	+
ZeroCore	-	+
Switchable graphics	-	+
Quick Sync	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	DirectX® 12
Shader Model	6.4	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.4
OpenCL	3.0	Not Listed
Vulkan	1.3	-
Mantle	-	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Iris Plus Graphics 655 4.50
+3.7%

R7 M380 4.34

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Iris Plus Graphics 655 1730
+3.7%

R7 M380 1668

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	19 +5.6%	18−20 −5.6%
1440p	10 +11.1%	9−10 −11.1%
4K	15 +7.1%	14−16 −7.1%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 +11.1%	9−10 −11.1%
Elden Ring	12−14 +9.1%	10−12 −9.1%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 +11.1%	9−10 −11.1%
Forza Horizon 4	18 −5.6%	18−20 +5.6%
Metro Exodus	11 +10%	10−11 −10%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Valorant	12−14 +9.1%	10−12 −9.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 +11.1%	9−10 −11.1%
Dota 2	17 +21.4%	14−16 −21.4%
Elden Ring	12−14 +9.1%	10−12 −9.1%
Far Cry 5	16 −37.5%	21−24 +37.5%
Fortnite	24−27 +4%	24−27 −4%
Forza Horizon 4	17 −11.8%	18−20 +11.8%
Grand Theft Auto V	10 −40%	14−16 +40%
Metro Exodus	5 −100%	10−11 +100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	41 +7.9%	35−40 −7.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Valorant	12−14 +9.1%	10−12 −9.1%
World of Tanks	50 −46%	70−75 +46%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 +11.1%	9−10 −11.1%
Dota 2	28 +100%	14−16 −100%
Far Cry 5	21−24 +4.5%	21−24 −4.5%
Forza Horizon 4	15 −26.7%	18−20 +26.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	35−40 +2.6%	35−40 −2.6%
Valorant	12−14 +9.1%	10−12 −9.1%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	4 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%
Elden Ring	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	4 +0%	4−5 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	30−33 +0%	30−33 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
World of Tanks	30−35 +3.2%	30−35 −3.2%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%
Far Cry 5	10−11 +11.1%	9−10 −11.1%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Metro Exodus	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Valorant	12−14 +8.3%	12−14 −8.3%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Elden Ring	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Metro Exodus	0−1	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	12−14 +8.3%	12−14 −8.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
World of Tanks	12 +20%	10−11 −20%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Dota 2	12 −33.3%	16−18 +33.3%
Far Cry 5	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Fortnite	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Valorant	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%

This is how Iris Plus Graphics 655 and R7 M380 compete in popular games:

Iris Plus Graphics 655 is 6% faster in 1080p
Iris Plus Graphics 655 is 11% faster in 1440p
Iris Plus Graphics 655 is 7% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Dota 2, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Iris Plus Graphics 655 is 100% faster.
in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the R7 M380 is 100% faster.

All in all, in popular games: