Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 8

Buy
VS
Buy
Price now 949$
Games supported 66%
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Buy
  • Interface PCIe 3.0 x1
  • Core clock speed 300
  • Max video memory 32768 Mb
  • Memory type DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4
  • Memory clock speed System Shared
  • Maximum resolution
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
Radeon RX Vega 8
Buy
  • Interface
  • Core clock speed
  • Max video memory
  • Memory type
  • Memory clock speed
  • Maximum resolution
Price now 273$
Games supported 66%
Graphics card Graphics card Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 AMD Radeon RX Vega 8

General info

Comparison of graphics card architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters.

Place in performance rating485489
Value for money1.275.23
ArchitectureGen. 9.5 Kaby LakeVega
GPU code nameKaby Lake GT3eVega Raven Ridge
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date3 January 2017 (4 years ago)26 October 2017 (3 years ago)
Price now$949 $273
Value for money

To get the index we compare the characteristics of video cards and their relative prices.

  • 0
  • 50
  • 100
  • 0
  • 50
  • 100

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48512
Core clock speed300 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1100 MHz1200 MHz
Number of transistors189 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm14 nm
Thermal design power (TDP)15 Wattno data
Texture fill rate55.20no data
Floating-point performance883 gflopsno data

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Information on Iris Plus Graphics 650 and Radeon RX Vega 8 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1no data

Memory

Parameters of memory installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4no data
Maximum RAM amount32 GBno data
Memory bus width64/128 Bitno data
Shared memory+-

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API support

APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs.

DirectX12 (12_1)DirectX 12_1
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.1no data
Vulkan1.1.103-

Benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.


Overall score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Iris Plus Graphics 650 6.49
+1.2%
RX Vega 8 6.41
  • 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
  • 3DMark Fire Strike Score
  • 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
  • 3DMark 11 Performance GPU
  • 3DMark Ice Storm GPU
  • Passmark

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Iris Plus Graphics 650 13153
RX Vega 8 15186
+15.5%
Iris Plus Graphics 650 1655
RX Vega 8 2142
+29.4%

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic enough graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Iris Plus Graphics 650 1698
RX Vega 8 2335
+37.5%

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Iris Plus Graphics 650 2762
RX Vega 8 3537
+28.1%

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Iris Plus Graphics 650 161538
+42.6%
RX Vega 8 113247

This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Iris Plus Graphics 650 1757
+1.2%
RX Vega 8 1737

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Iris Plus Graphics 650RX Vega 8
1080p22
+15.8%
19
−15.8%
4Kno data10

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance rating 6.49 6.41
Novelty 3 January 2017 26 October 2017
Pipelines / CUDA cores 48 512

Technical City couldn't decide between

Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650

and

AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8

The differences in performance seem too small.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Competitors of Radeon RX Vega 8 by NVIDIA

We believe that the nearest equivalent to Radeon RX Vega 8 from NVIDIA is GeForce 8800M GTX SLI, which is slower by 1% and lower by 2 positions in our rating.

NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX SLI GeForce 8800M GTX SLI
Compare

Here are some closest NVIDIA rivals to Radeon RX Vega 8:

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of video cards with performance more or less close to those reviewed, providing you with more probable options to consider.

User rating

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


Advices and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.