RTX 6000 Ada Generation vs Iris Plus Graphics 650

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Iris Plus Graphics 650 with RTX 6000 Ada Generation, including specs and performance data.

Iris Plus Graphics 650
2017
32 GB DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4, 15 Watt
4.46

RTX 6000 Ada Generation outperforms Iris Plus Graphics 650 by a whopping 1524% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking66316
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data7.67
Power efficiency20.8816.95
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameKaby Lake GT3eAD102
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date3 January 2017 (8 years ago)3 December 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$6,799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38418176
Core clock speed300 MHz915 MHz
Boost clock speed1150 MHz2505 MHz
Number of transistors189 million76,300 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm++5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate55.201,423
Floating-point processing power0.8832 TFLOPS91.06 TFLOPS
ROPs6192
TMUs48568
Tensor Coresno data568
Ray Tracing Coresno data142

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount32 GB48 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared384 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data960.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent4x DisplayPort 1.4a

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Iris Plus Graphics 650 4.46
RTX 6000 Ada Generation 72.41
+1524%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Iris Plus Graphics 650 1757
RTX 6000 Ada Generation 28492
+1522%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Iris Plus Graphics 650 2762
RTX 6000 Ada Generation 70850
+2465%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Iris Plus Graphics 650 1698
RTX 6000 Ada Generation 36679
+2060%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD22
−736%
184
+736%
1440p9−10
−1700%
162
+1700%
4K6−7
−1750%
111
+1750%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data36.95
1440pno data41.97
4Kno data61.25

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 10−11
−2000%
210−220
+2000%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
−1391%
164
+1391%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−1822%
170−180
+1822%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 10−11
−2000%
210−220
+2000%
Battlefield 5 16−18
−959%
180−190
+959%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
−1382%
163
+1382%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−1822%
170−180
+1822%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−1082%
130
+1082%
Fortnite 24−27
−1108%
300−350
+1108%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
−1270%
270−280
+1270%
Forza Horizon 5 9−10
−2100%
190−200
+2100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−941%
170−180
+941%
Valorant 55−60
−605%
350−400
+605%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 10−11
−2000%
210−220
+2000%
Battlefield 5 16−18
−959%
180−190
+959%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
−1309%
155
+1309%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 75−80
−271%
270−280
+271%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−1822%
170−180
+1822%
Dota 2 30
−1400%
450−500
+1400%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−1045%
126
+1045%
Fortnite 24−27
−1108%
300−350
+1108%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
−1270%
270−280
+1270%
Forza Horizon 5 9−10
−2100%
190−200
+2100%
Grand Theft Auto V 8
−2025%
170−180
+2025%
Metro Exodus 8−9
−1325%
114
+1325%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−941%
170−180
+941%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−3975%
489
+3975%
Valorant 55−60
−605%
350−400
+605%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
−959%
180−190
+959%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
−1236%
147
+1236%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−1822%
170−180
+1822%
Dota 2 25
−1500%
400−450
+1500%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−973%
118
+973%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
−1270%
270−280
+1270%
Forza Horizon 5 9−10
−1456%
140−150
+1456%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−941%
170−180
+941%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−2067%
260
+2067%
Valorant 55−60
−605%
350−400
+605%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 24−27
−1108%
300−350
+1108%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−35
−1464%
500−550
+1464%
Grand Theft Auto V 4−5
−3475%
140−150
+3475%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−3067%
95
+3067%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−465%
170−180
+465%
Valorant 45−50
−954%
450−500
+954%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
−8700%
170−180
+8700%
Counter-Strike 2 6−7
−1483%
95−100
+1483%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−3233%
100−105
+3233%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−1375%
118
+1375%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
−2290%
230−240
+2290%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7
−1483%
95−100
+1483%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−3029%
219
+3029%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 8−9
−1788%
150−160
+1788%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 4−5
−1525%
65−70
+1525%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−938%
160−170
+938%
Valorant 21−24
−1481%
300−350
+1481%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−13000%
130−140
+13000%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−4700%
45−50
+4700%
Dota 2 14−16
−1471%
220−230
+1471%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−2775%
115
+2775%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−3780%
190−200
+3780%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
−1400%
30−33
+1400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
−1820%
95−100
+1820%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 5−6
−1480%
75−80
+1480%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 79
+0%
79
+0%
Metro Exodus 90
+0%
90
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 184
+0%
184
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30
+0%
30
+0%

This is how Iris Plus Graphics 650 and RTX 6000 Ada Generation compete in popular games:

  • RTX 6000 Ada Generation is 736% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 6000 Ada Generation is 1700% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 6000 Ada Generation is 1750% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Battlefield 5, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 6000 Ada Generation is 13000% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 6000 Ada Generation is ahead in 56 tests (92%)
  • there's a draw in 5 tests (8%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.46 72.41
Recency 3 January 2017 3 December 2022
Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 48 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 300 Watt

Iris Plus Graphics 650 has 1900% lower power consumption.

RTX 6000 Ada Generation, on the other hand, has a 1523.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 6000 Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Plus Graphics 650 in performance tests.

Be aware that Iris Plus Graphics 650 is a notebook card while RTX 6000 Ada Generation is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
Iris Plus Graphics 650
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation
RTX 6000 Ada Generation

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 98 votes

Rate Iris Plus Graphics 650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 104 votes

Rate RTX 6000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Iris Plus Graphics 650 or RTX 6000 Ada Generation, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.