RTX A4500 vs Iris Plus Graphics 645

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Iris Plus Graphics 645 with RTX A4500, including specs and performance data.

Iris Plus Graphics 645
2019
15 Watt
4.45

RTX A4500 outperforms Iris Plus Graphics 645 by a whopping 1161% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking66145
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency20.5419.42
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameCoffee Lake GT3eGA102
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date7 October 2019 (5 years ago)23 November 2021 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3847168
Core clock speed300 MHz1050 MHz
Boost clock speed1050 MHz1650 MHz
Number of transistorsno data28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm+++8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt200 Watt
Texture fill rate50.40369.6
Floating-point processing power0.8064 TFLOPS23.65 TFLOPS
ROPs696
TMUs48224
Tensor Coresno data224
Ray Tracing Coresno data56

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared20 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared320 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data640.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent4x DisplayPort 1.4a

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Iris Plus Graphics 645 4.45
RTX A4500 56.10
+1161%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Iris Plus Graphics 645 1715
RTX A4500 21642
+1162%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD25
−1100%
300−350
+1100%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−1114%
85−90
+1114%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
−1082%
130−140
+1082%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−1067%
35−40
+1067%
Battlefield 5 9−10
−1122%
110−120
+1122%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
−1122%
110−120
+1122%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−1114%
85−90
+1114%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−1150%
100−105
+1150%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−12
−1082%
130−140
+1082%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−1150%
300−310
+1150%
Hitman 3 9−10
−1122%
110−120
+1122%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
−1011%
300−310
+1011%
Metro Exodus 8−9
−1150%
100−105
+1150%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
−1100%
120−130
+1100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
−1100%
180−190
+1100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−1063%
500−550
+1063%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
−1082%
130−140
+1082%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−1067%
35−40
+1067%
Battlefield 5 9−10
−1122%
110−120
+1122%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
−1122%
110−120
+1122%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−1114%
85−90
+1114%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−1150%
100−105
+1150%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−12
−1082%
130−140
+1082%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−1150%
300−310
+1150%
Hitman 3 9−10
−1122%
110−120
+1122%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
−1011%
300−310
+1011%
Metro Exodus 8−9
−1150%
100−105
+1150%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
−1100%
120−130
+1100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
−1100%
180−190
+1100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−1150%
200−210
+1150%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−1063%
500−550
+1063%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
−1082%
130−140
+1082%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−1067%
35−40
+1067%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
−1122%
110−120
+1122%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−1114%
85−90
+1114%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−1150%
100−105
+1150%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−1150%
300−310
+1150%
Hitman 3 9−10
−1122%
110−120
+1122%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
−1011%
300−310
+1011%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
−1100%
180−190
+1100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−1150%
200−210
+1150%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−1063%
500−550
+1063%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
−1100%
120−130
+1100%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8
−1114%
85−90
+1114%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
−1150%
75−80
+1150%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−1150%
50−55
+1150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−1067%
35−40
+1067%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−1100%
60−65
+1100%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−1150%
50−55
+1150%
Hitman 3 8−9
−1150%
100−105
+1150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 9−10
−1122%
110−120
+1122%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−1067%
35−40
+1067%
Watch Dogs: Legion 24−27
−1100%
300−310
+1100%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−1150%
100−105
+1150%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%
Hitman 3 0−1 0−1
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−1067%
35−40
+1067%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−1100%
60−65
+1100%

This is how Iris Plus Graphics 645 and RTX A4500 compete in popular games:

  • RTX A4500 is 1100% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.45 56.10
Recency 7 October 2019 23 November 2021
Chip lithography 14 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 200 Watt

Iris Plus Graphics 645 has 1233.3% lower power consumption.

RTX A4500, on the other hand, has a 1160.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX A4500 is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Plus Graphics 645 in performance tests.

Be aware that Iris Plus Graphics 645 is a desktop card while RTX A4500 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
Iris Plus Graphics 645
NVIDIA RTX A4500
RTX A4500

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 116 votes

Rate Iris Plus Graphics 645 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 190 votes

Rate RTX A4500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.