GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition vs HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)

Place in performance ranking	1201	671
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Architecture	Gen. 7 Ivy Bridge (2011−2012)	Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code name	Ivy Bridge GT1	GK107
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	1 October 2012 (11 years ago)	8 November 2013 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	6	384
Core clock speed	350 MHz	926 MHz
Boost clock speed	1100 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	no data	1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology	22 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	50 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	29.63
Floating-point performance	no data	0.7112 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	no data	PCIe 3.0 x16
Width	no data	MXM Module

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	no data	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	no data	2 GB
Memory bus width	64/128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	no data	5016 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	80.26 GB/s
Shared memory	+	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

no data

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.0	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	no data	5.1
OpenGL	no data	4.6
OpenCL	no data	1.2
Vulkan	-	1.1.126
CUDA	-	3.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) 0.63

GT 750M Mac Edition 4.34
+589%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) 1491

GT 750M Mac Edition 10049
+574%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) 286

GT 750M Mac Edition 1837
+543%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−567%

60−65
+567%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

3−4
−500%

18−20

+500%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 −575%	27−30 +575%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −500%	18−20 +500%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −500%	18−20 +500%
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2 −500%	6−7 +500%
Hitman 3	5−6 −500%	30−33 +500%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−12 −582%	75−80 +582%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 −567%	40−45 +567%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−33 −567%	200−210 +567%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 −575%	27−30 +575%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −500%	18−20 +500%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −500%	18−20 +500%
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2 −500%	6−7 +500%
Hitman 3	5−6 −500%	30−33 +500%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−12 −582%	75−80 +582%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 −567%	40−45 +567%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 −550%	65−70 +550%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−33 −567%	200−210 +567%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 −575%	27−30 +575%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −500%	18−20 +500%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −500%	18−20 +500%
Hitman 3	5−6 −500%	30−33 +500%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−12 −582%	75−80 +582%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 −567%	40−45 +567%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 −550%	65−70 +550%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−33 −567%	200−210 +567%

1440p
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn

1−2

−500%

6−7
+500%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −500%	6−7 +500%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −500%	6−7 +500%
Hitman 3	6−7 −567%	40−45 +567%
Horizon Zero Dawn	3−4 −500%	18−20 +500%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2 −500%	6−7 +500%