Quadro T1000 Max-Q vs HD Graphics 515

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics 515 with Quadro T1000 Max-Q, including specs and performance data.

HD Graphics 515
2015
15 Watt
1.52

T1000 Max-Q outperforms HD Graphics 515 by a whopping 951% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1016367
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency7.8024.61
ArchitectureGeneration 9.0 (2015−2016)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameSkylake GT2TU117
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date1 September 2015 (10 years ago)27 May 2019 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192896
Core clock speed300 MHz765 MHz
Boost clock speed800 MHz1350 MHz
Number of transistorsno data4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm+12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate19.2075.60
Floating-point processing power0.3072 TFLOPS2.419 TFLOPS
ROPs332
TMUs2456
L1 Cacheno data896 KB
L2 Cacheno data1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfaceRing BusPCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data80 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.2
CUDA-7.5

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

HD Graphics 515 1.52
T1000 Max-Q 15.98
+951%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD Graphics 515 635
Samples: 1489
T1000 Max-Q 6642
+946%
Samples: 364

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD11
−900%
110−120
+900%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 0−1 90−95
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1033%
30−35
+1033%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 1−2
−3400%
35−40
+3400%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 3−4
−2200%
65−70
+2200%
Counter-Strike 2 0−1 90−95
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1033%
30−35
+1033%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−1667%
50−55
+1667%
Fortnite 5−6
−1700%
90−95
+1700%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
−644%
65−70
+644%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
−2450%
50−55
+2450%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
−510%
60−65
+510%
Valorant 35−40
−271%
130−140
+271%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 3−4
−2200%
65−70
+2200%
Counter-Strike 2 0−1 90−95
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 20
−950%
210−220
+950%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1033%
30−35
+1033%
Dota 2 9
−1000%
95−100
+1000%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−1667%
50−55
+1667%
Fortnite 5−6
−1700%
90−95
+1700%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
−644%
65−70
+644%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
−2450%
50−55
+2450%
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2
−6000%
60−65
+6000%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−1600%
30−35
+1600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
−510%
60−65
+510%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−529%
40−45
+529%
Valorant 35−40
−271%
130−140
+271%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 3−4
−2200%
65−70
+2200%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1033%
30−35
+1033%
Dota 2 8
−1138%
95−100
+1138%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−1667%
50−55
+1667%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
−644%
65−70
+644%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
−510%
60−65
+510%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−529%
40−45
+529%
Valorant 35−40
−271%
130−140
+271%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 5−6
−1700%
90−95
+1700%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
−700%
30−35
+700%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 10−11
−1100%
120−130
+1100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
−953%
150−160
+953%
Valorant 7−8
−2200%
160−170
+2200%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1400%
14−16
+1400%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−1700%
35−40
+1700%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−900%
40−45
+900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−700%
24−27
+700%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−1750%
35−40
+1750%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−114%
30−33
+114%
Valorant 7−8
−1200%
90−95
+1200%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 2−3
−2800%
55−60
+2800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−700%
16−18
+700%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−700%
16−18
+700%

1440p
High

Grand Theft Auto V 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Metro Exodus 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

This is how HD Graphics 515 and T1000 Max-Q compete in popular games:

  • T1000 Max-Q is 900% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Grand Theft Auto V, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the T1000 Max-Q is 6000% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • T1000 Max-Q performs better in 46 tests (81%)
  • there's a draw in 11 tests (19%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.52 15.98
Recency 1 September 2015 27 May 2019
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 50 Watt

HD Graphics 515 has 233% lower power consumption.

T1000 Max-Q, on the other hand, has a 951% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 17% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro T1000 Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 515 in performance tests.

Be aware that HD Graphics 515 is a notebook graphics card while Quadro T1000 Max-Q is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 73 votes

Rate HD Graphics 515 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 24 votes

Rate Quadro T1000 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 515 or Quadro T1000 Max-Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.