RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs HD Graphics 4200

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics 4200 with RTX 2000 Ada Generation, including specs and performance data.

HD Graphics 4200
2013
4 Watt
0.99

RTX 2000 Ada Generation outperforms HD Graphics 4200 by a whopping 4538% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking110572
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data81.28
Power efficiency17.2045.60
ArchitectureGeneration 7.5 (2013)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameHaswell GT2AD107
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date2 September 2013 (11 years ago)12 February 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$649

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1602816
Core clock speed200 MHz1620 MHz
Boost clock speed850 MHz2130 MHz
Number of transistors392 million18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology22 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)4 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate17.00187.4
Floating-point processing power0.272 TFLOPS12 TFLOPS
ROPs248
TMUs2088
Tensor Coresno data88
Ray Tracing Coresno data22

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared16 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data256.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.34.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan+1.3
CUDA-8.9

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD8
−4275%
350−400
+4275%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data1.85

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−4233%
130−140
+4233%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−4500%
230−240
+4500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−4233%
130−140
+4233%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−4233%
130−140
+4233%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−4400%
90−95
+4400%
Hitman 3 5−6
−4500%
230−240
+4500%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−4515%
600−650
+4515%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−4400%
45−50
+4400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−4186%
300−310
+4186%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−4416%
1400−1450
+4416%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−4500%
230−240
+4500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−4233%
130−140
+4233%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−4233%
130−140
+4233%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−4400%
90−95
+4400%
Hitman 3 5−6
−4500%
230−240
+4500%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−4515%
600−650
+4515%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−4400%
45−50
+4400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−4186%
300−310
+4186%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−4400%
450−500
+4400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−4416%
1400−1450
+4416%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−4500%
230−240
+4500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−4233%
130−140
+4233%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−4233%
130−140
+4233%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Hitman 3 5−6
−4500%
230−240
+4500%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−4515%
600−650
+4515%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−4186%
300−310
+4186%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−4400%
450−500
+4400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−4416%
1400−1450
+4416%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−4400%
45−50
+4400%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−4400%
45−50
+4400%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−4400%
45−50
+4400%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−4400%
45−50
+4400%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−4400%
45−50
+4400%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−4400%
45−50
+4400%
Hitman 3 7−8
−4186%
300−310
+4186%
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
−4400%
180−190
+4400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5
−4400%
180−190
+4400%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−4233%
130−140
+4233%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−4400%
45−50
+4400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−4400%
90−95
+4400%

This is how HD Graphics 4200 and RTX 2000 Ada Generation compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2000 Ada Generation is 4275% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.99 45.92
Recency 2 September 2013 12 February 2024
Chip lithography 22 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 70 Watt

HD Graphics 4200 has 1650% lower power consumption.

RTX 2000 Ada Generation, on the other hand, has a 4538.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, and a 340% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 2000 Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 4200 in performance tests.

Be aware that HD Graphics 4200 is a notebook card while RTX 2000 Ada Generation is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 4200
HD Graphics 4200
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
RTX 2000 Ada Generation

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 41 vote

Rate HD Graphics 4200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 26 votes

Rate RTX 2000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.