UHD Graphics 750 vs HD Graphics 405

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics 405 with UHD Graphics 750, including specs and performance data.

HD Graphics 405
2015
6 Watt
0.74

UHD Graphics 750 outperforms HD Graphics 405 by a whopping 509% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1173671
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency8.4620.61
ArchitectureGeneration 8.0 (2014−2015)Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)
GPU code nameBraswell GT1Rocket Lake GT1
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 April 2015 (9 years ago)30 March 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128256
Core clock speed200 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed600 MHz1300 MHz
Number of transistors189 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm14 nm+++
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate9.60020.80
Floating-point processing power0.1536 TFLOPS0.6656 TFLOPS
ROPs28
TMUs1616

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusRing Bus
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.34.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan+1.2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD15
−500%
90−95
+500%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−57.1%
10−12
+57.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−57.1%
10−12
+57.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−300%
20−22
+300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−113%
16−18
+113%
Valorant 27−30
−93.1%
55−60
+93.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−57.1%
10−12
+57.1%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 20−22
−270%
70−75
+270%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%
Dota 2 12−14
−477%
75−80
+477%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−300%
20−22
+300%
Metro Exodus 0−1 8−9
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−113%
16−18
+113%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−140%
12−14
+140%
Valorant 27−30
−93.1%
55−60
+93.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−57.1%
10−12
+57.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%
Dota 2 12−14
−477%
75−80
+477%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−300%
20−22
+300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−113%
16−18
+113%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−140%
12−14
+140%
Valorant 27−30
−93.1%
55−60
+93.1%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 3−4
−967%
30−35
+967%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
−650%
30−33
+650%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 3−4
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 1−2
−700%
8−9
+700%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 0−1 3−4
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%
Valorant 4−5
−425%
21−24
+425%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 1−2
Far Cry 5 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Fortnite 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Fortnite 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Valorant 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

This is how HD Graphics 405 and UHD Graphics 750 compete in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics 750 is 500% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the UHD Graphics 750 is 967% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics 750 is ahead in 33 tests (60%)
  • there's a draw in 22 tests (40%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.74 4.51
Recency 1 April 2015 30 March 2021
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 15 Watt

HD Graphics 405 has 150% lower power consumption.

UHD Graphics 750, on the other hand, has a 509.5% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 5 years.

The UHD Graphics 750 is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 405 in performance tests.

Be aware that HD Graphics 405 is a notebook card while UHD Graphics 750 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 405
HD Graphics 405
Intel UHD Graphics 750
UHD Graphics 750

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 221 vote

Rate HD Graphics 405 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 407 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 405 or UHD Graphics 750, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.