Radeon RX 6650M XT vs HD Graphics 405

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics 405 and Radeon RX 6650M XT, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.


HD Graphics 405
2015
6 Watt
0.69

6650M XT outperforms HD Graphics 405 by a whopping 5816% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1232113
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency8.8626.19
ArchitectureGeneration 8.0 (2014−2015)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameBraswell GT1Navi 23
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 April 2015 (11 years ago)4 January 2022 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1282048
Core clock speed200 MHz2068 MHz
Boost clock speed600 MHz2416 MHz
Number of transistors189 million11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rate9.600309.2
Floating-point processing power0.1536 TFLOPS9.896 TFLOPS
ROPs264
TMUs16128
Ray Tracing Coresno data32
L0 Cacheno data512 KB
L1 Cacheno data512 KB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB
L3 Cacheno data32 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfaceRing BusPCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data256.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.34.6
OpenCL3.02.1
Vulkan+1.3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD15
−5567%
850−900
+5567%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−4750%
95−100
+4750%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−4750%
95−100
+4750%
Far Cry 5 0−1 130−140
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−3080%
150−160
+3080%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−1888%
150−160
+1888%
Valorant 27−30
−714%
230−240
+714%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 20−22
−1295%
270−280
+1295%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−4750%
95−100
+4750%
Dota 2 12−14
−1117%
140−150
+1117%
Far Cry 5 0−1 130−140
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−3080%
150−160
+3080%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−9800%
95−100
+9800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−1888%
150−160
+1888%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−2400%
150−160
+2400%
Valorant 27−30
−714%
230−240
+714%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−4750%
95−100
+4750%
Dota 2 12−14
−1117%
140−150
+1117%
Far Cry 5 0−1 130−140
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−3080%
150−160
+3080%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−1888%
150−160
+1888%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−2400%
150−160
+2400%
Valorant 27−30
−714%
230−240
+714%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−3433%
100−110
+3433%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 4−5
−7150%
290−300
+7150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−2400%
170−180
+2400%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−5850%
110−120
+5850%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−3900%
80−85
+3900%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 1−2
−10900%
110−120
+10900%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−557%
90−95
+557%
Valorant 3−4
−8267%
250−260
+8267%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−2800%
55−60
+2800%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−2650%
55−60
+2650%

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Fortnite 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Fortnite 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%

1440p
High

Grand Theft Auto V 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Valorant 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Dota 2 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

This is how HD Graphics 405 and RX 6650M XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 6650M XT is 5567% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Fortnite, with 1440p resolution and the Epic Preset, the RX 6650M XT is 10900% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 6650M XT performs better in 29 tests (51%)
  • there's a draw in 28 tests (49%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.69 40.82
Recency 1 April 2015 4 January 2022
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 120 Watt

HD Graphics 405 has 1900% lower power consumption.

RX 6650M XT, on the other hand, has a 5816% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6650M XT is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 405 in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 281 votes

Rate HD Graphics 405 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 79 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6650M XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 405 or Radeon RX 6650M XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.