Tesla M6 vs HD Graphics 4000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

HD Graphics 4000
2011
1.17

Tesla M6 outperforms HD Graphics 4000 by a whopping 1290% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking1030310
Place by popularity35not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.138.54
ArchitectureGen. 7 Ivy Bridge (2011−2012)Maxwell 2.0 (2015−2019)
GPU code nameIvy BridgeGM204
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date23 March 2011 (13 years ago)30 August 2015 (8 years ago)
Current price$91 $350

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Tesla M6 has 6469% better value for money than HD Graphics 4000.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores161536
Core clock speed350 MHz930 MHz
Boost clock speed1350 MHz1180 MHz
Number of transistors1,200 million5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology22 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)unknown100 Watt
Texture fill rate20.80113.3
Floating-point performance33.6 gflops3,625 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on HD Graphics 4000 and Tesla M6 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Widthno dataMXM Module
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus width64/128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared5012 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data160.4 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.4
OpenGL4.04.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.801.1.126
CUDAno data5.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD Graphics 4000 1.17
Tesla M6 16.26
+1290%

Tesla M6 outperforms HD Graphics 4000 by 1290% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

HD Graphics 4000 454
Tesla M6 6284
+1284%

Tesla M6 outperforms HD Graphics 4000 by 1284% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p12
−1233%
160−170
+1233%
Full HD10
−1200%
130−140
+1200%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1233%
40−45
+1233%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−1233%
40−45
+1233%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1233%
40−45
+1233%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−1233%
80−85
+1233%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−1200%
65−70
+1200%
Hitman 3 4−5
−1275%
55−60
+1275%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−1233%
160−170
+1233%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
−1233%
120−130
+1233%

Full HD
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−1233%
40−45
+1233%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1233%
40−45
+1233%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−1233%
80−85
+1233%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−1200%
65−70
+1200%
Hitman 3 4−5
−1275%
55−60
+1275%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−1233%
160−170
+1233%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
−1233%
120−130
+1233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−1275%
55−60
+1275%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−1233%
40−45
+1233%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1233%
40−45
+1233%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−1233%
80−85
+1233%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−1200%
65−70
+1200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−1233%
160−170
+1233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−1275%
55−60
+1275%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−1275%
55−60
+1275%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−1250%
27−30
+1250%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
−1275%
55−60
+1275%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5 6−7
−1233%
80−85
+1233%
Horizon Zero Dawn 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−1275%
55−60
+1275%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−1250%
27−30
+1250%

This is how HD Graphics 4000 and Tesla M6 compete in popular games:

  • Tesla M6 is 1233% faster in 900p
  • Tesla M6 is 1200% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.17 16.26
Recency 23 March 2011 30 August 2015
Chip lithography 22 nm 28 nm

The Tesla M6 is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 4000 in performance tests.

Be aware that HD Graphics 4000 is a notebook card while Tesla M6 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 4000
HD Graphics 4000
NVIDIA Tesla M6
Tesla M6

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 4841 vote

Rate HD Graphics 4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 30 votes

Rate Tesla M6 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.