Radeon Pro Vega II Duo vs HD Graphics 3000

Place in performance ranking	1191	129
Place by popularity	69	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	7.46
Architecture	Gen. 6 Sandy Bridge (2011)	GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code name	Sandy Bridge	Vega 20
Market segment	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	1 February 2011 (13 years ago)	3 June 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$4,399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	12	4096
Core clock speed	350 MHz	1400 MHz
Boost clock speed	1350 MHz	1720 MHz
Number of transistors	995 million	13,230 million
Manufacturing process technology	32 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	unknown	475 Watt
Texture fill rate	13.80	440.3
Floating-point performance	0.2208 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 1.0 x16	Apple MPX
Width	no data	Quad-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	no data	HBM2
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	32 GB
Memory bus width	64/128 Bit	4096 Bit
Memory clock speed	no data	2 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	no data	1.02 TB/s
Shared memory	+	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI 2.0b, 4x Thunderbolt
HDMI	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.1 (10_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	4.1	6.7
OpenGL	3.1	4.6
OpenCL	N/A	2.1
Vulkan	N/A	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD Graphics 3000 0.66

Pro Vega II Duo 36.33
+5405%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD Graphics 3000 254

Pro Vega II Duo 14018
+5419%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−4900%

400−450
+4900%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

3−4
−5233%

160−170

+5233%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 −5400%	220−230 +5400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −5233%	160−170 +5233%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −5233%	160−170 +5233%
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2 −5400%	55−60 +5400%
Hitman 3	5−6 −5300%	270−280 +5300%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−12 −5355%	600−650 +5355%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 −4900%	300−310 +4900%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−33 −5400%	1650−1700 +5400%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 −5400%	220−230 +5400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −5233%	160−170 +5233%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −5233%	160−170 +5233%
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2 −5400%	55−60 +5400%
Hitman 3	5−6 −5300%	270−280 +5300%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−12 −5355%	600−650 +5355%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 −4900%	300−310 +4900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 −5400%	550−600 +5400%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−33 −5400%	1650−1700 +5400%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 −5400%	220−230 +5400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −5233%	160−170 +5233%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −5233%	160−170 +5233%
Hitman 3	5−6 −5300%	270−280 +5300%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−12 −5355%	600−650 +5355%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 −4900%	300−310 +4900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 −5400%	550−600 +5400%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−33 −5400%	1650−1700 +5400%

1440p
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn

1−2

−5400%

55−60
+5400%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −5400%	55−60 +5400%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −5400%	55−60 +5400%
Hitman 3	6−7 −4900%	300−310 +4900%
Horizon Zero Dawn	3−4 −5233%	160−170 +5233%
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3 −5400%	110−120 +5400%