Mobility Radeon HD 5165 vs HD Graphics 3000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics 3000 and Mobility Radeon HD 5165, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

HD Graphics 3000
2011
0.66

ATI Mobility HD 5165 outperforms HD Graphics 3000 by an impressive 65% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking11471050
Place by popularity90not in top-100
ArchitectureGen. 6 Sandy Bridge (2011)Terascale 1 (2008−2010)
GPU code nameSandy BridgeM96
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 February 2011 (13 years ago)7 January 2010 (14 years ago)
Current price$476 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12320
Core clock speed350 MHz600 MHz
Boost clock speed1350 MHzno data
Number of transistors995 million514 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)unknown35 Watt
Texture fill rate13.8019.20
Floating-point performance20.4 gflops384.0 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on HD Graphics 3000 and Mobility Radeon HD 5165 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem Shared(G)DDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared1 GB
Memory bus width64/128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared900 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data28.8 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model4.14.1
OpenGL3.13.3
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD Graphics 3000 0.66
ATI Mobility HD 5165 1.09
+65.2%

Mobility Radeon HD 5165 outperforms HD Graphics 3000 by 65% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

HD Graphics 3000 1568
ATI Mobility HD 5165 2789
+77.9%

Mobility Radeon HD 5165 outperforms HD Graphics 3000 by 78% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD8
−50%
12−14
+50%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2 no data
Hitman 3 2−3 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−11 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2 no data
Hitman 3 2−3 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−11 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−11 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 no data
Far Cry 5 1−2 no data
Hitman 3 6−7 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4 no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4 no data

4K
High Preset

Horizon Zero Dawn 1−2 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 1−2 no data
Metro Exodus 4−5 no data

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 0−1

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1

This is how HD Graphics 3000 and ATI Mobility HD 5165 compete in popular games:

  • ATI Mobility HD 5165 is 50% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.66 1.09
Recency 1 February 2011 7 January 2010
Chip lithography 32 nm 55 nm

The Mobility Radeon HD 5165 is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 3000 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 3000
HD Graphics 3000
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5165
Mobility Radeon HD 5165

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 2231 vote

Rate HD Graphics 3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 5165 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.