Radeon PRO W7700 vs HD Graphics 2500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Aggregate performance score

HD Graphics 2500
2012
0.68

Radeon PRO W7700 outperforms HD Graphics 2500 by a whopping 7607% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking113745
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data23.97
ArchitectureGen. 7 Ivy Bridge (2011−2012)RDNA 3.0 (2022)
GPU code nameIvy Bridge GT1Navi 32
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 April 2012 (12 years ago)13 November 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$999
Current price$521 $999 (1x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

HD Graphics 2500 and PRO W7700 have a nearly equal value for money.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores63072
Core clock speed650 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1150 MHz2600 MHz
Number of transistors392 million28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology22 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)unknown190 Watt
Texture fill rate6.900499.2
Floating-point performance13.8 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on HD Graphics 2500 and Radeon PRO W7700 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data241 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared16 GB
Memory bus width64/128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared18 GB/s
Memory bandwidthno data576.0 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort 2.1

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.7
OpenGL4.04.6
OpenCL1.22.2
Vulkan1.1.801.3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD7
−7043%
500−550
+7043%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−7567%
230−240
+7567%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−7400%
150−160
+7400%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−7567%
230−240
+7567%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−6900%
350−400
+6900%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−7567%
230−240
+7567%
Hitman 3 3−4
−7567%
230−240
+7567%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−7173%
800−850
+7173%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−7400%
600−650
+7400%

Full HD
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−7400%
150−160
+7400%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−7567%
230−240
+7567%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−6900%
350−400
+6900%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−7567%
230−240
+7567%
Hitman 3 3−4
−7567%
230−240
+7567%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−7173%
800−850
+7173%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−7400%
600−650
+7400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−7567%
230−240
+7567%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−7400%
150−160
+7400%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−7567%
230−240
+7567%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−6900%
350−400
+6900%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−7567%
230−240
+7567%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−7173%
800−850
+7173%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−7567%
230−240
+7567%

1440p
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−7400%
300−310
+7400%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−7400%
75−80
+7400%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−7400%
75−80
+7400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4
−7567%
230−240
+7567%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−7400%
75−80
+7400%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5 5−6
−6900%
350−400
+6900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 1−2
−7400%
75−80
+7400%

4K
Ultra Preset

Horizon Zero Dawn 1−2
−7400%
75−80
+7400%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−7400%
300−310
+7400%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−7400%
150−160
+7400%

This is how HD Graphics 2500 and PRO W7700 compete in popular games:

  • PRO W7700 is 7043% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.68 52.41
Recency 1 April 2012 13 November 2023
Maximum RAM amount System Shared 16 GB
Chip lithography 22 nm 5 nm

The Radeon PRO W7700 is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 2500 in performance tests.

Be aware that HD Graphics 2500 is a notebook card while Radeon PRO W7700 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 2500
HD Graphics 2500
AMD Radeon PRO W7700
Radeon PRO W7700

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 1156 votes

Rate HD Graphics 2500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 3 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W7700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.