ATI Radeon HD 3870 vs HD Graphics 2500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics 2500 and Radeon HD 3870, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

HD Graphics 2500
2012
0.69

ATI HD 3870 outperforms HD Graphics 2500 by a whopping 109% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1176997
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.05
Power efficiencyno data0.94
ArchitectureGeneration 7.0 (2012−2013)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameIvy Bridge GT1RV670
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 April 2012 (12 years ago)19 November 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$269

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48320
Core clock speed650 MHz777 MHz
Boost clock speed1150 MHzno data
Number of transistors392 million666 million
Manufacturing process technology22 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)unknown106 Watt
Texture fill rate6.90012.43
Floating-point processing power0.1104 TFLOPS0.4973 TFLOPS
ROPs116
TMUs616

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data241 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR4
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared512 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1126 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data72.06 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (11_0)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model5.04.1
OpenGL4.03.3
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.1.80N/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD8
−100%
16−18
+100%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data16.81

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−100%
18−20
+100%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−100%
18−20
+100%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−100%
12−14
+100%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−100%
10−11
+100%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−100%
18−20
+100%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−100%
16−18
+100%
Fortnite 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−100%
12−14
+100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−100%
18−20
+100%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−100%
10−11
+100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−100%
10−11
+100%
World of Tanks 12
−100%
24−27
+100%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−100%
18−20
+100%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−100%
16−18
+100%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−100%
12−14
+100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−100%
18−20
+100%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
−100%
8−9
+100%
World of Tanks 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−100%
18−20
+100%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−100%
8−9
+100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
Valorant 5−6
−100%
10−11
+100%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 14−16
−100%
30−33
+100%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−100%
30−33
+100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−100%
30−33
+100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Dota 2 14−16
−100%
30−33
+100%
Valorant 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%

This is how HD Graphics 2500 and ATI HD 3870 compete in popular games:

  • ATI HD 3870 is 100% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.69 1.44
Recency 1 April 2012 19 November 2007
Chip lithography 22 nm 55 nm

HD Graphics 2500 has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.

ATI HD 3870, on the other hand, has a 108.7% higher aggregate performance score.

The Radeon HD 3870 is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 2500 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 2500
HD Graphics 2500
ATI Radeon HD 3870
Radeon HD 3870

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 1437 votes

Rate HD Graphics 2500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 163 votes

Rate Radeon HD 3870 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.