Radeon Pro W6400 vs HD Graphics 2000

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics 2000 with Radeon Pro W6400, including specs and performance data.

HD Graphics 2000
2011
0.55

Pro W6400 outperforms HD Graphics 2000 by a whopping 3709% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1212260
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data29.00
ArchitectureGeneration 6.0 (2011)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameSandy Bridge GT1Navi 24
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 February 2011 (13 years ago)19 January 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48768
Core clock speed850 MHz2331 MHz
Boost clock speed1350 MHz2331 MHz
Number of transistors189 million5,400 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)unknown50 Watt
Texture fill rate8.100111.9
Floating-point processing power0.1296 TFLOPS3.58 TFLOPS
ROPs132
TMUs648
Ray Tracing Coresno data12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x4
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data112.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DisplayPort 1.4a

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.16.6
OpenGL3.14.6
OpenCLN/A2.2
VulkanN/A1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD Graphics 2000 0.55
Pro W6400 20.95
+3709%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD Graphics 2000 213
Pro W6400 8081
+3694%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD11
−3536%
400−450
+3536%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−3650%
75−80
+3650%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−3567%
110−120
+3567%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−3650%
75−80
+3650%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−3650%
75−80
+3650%
Hitman 3 4−5
−3650%
150−160
+3650%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−3650%
300−310
+3650%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−3650%
150−160
+3650%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−3650%
1050−1100
+3650%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−3567%
110−120
+3567%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−3650%
75−80
+3650%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−3650%
75−80
+3650%
Hitman 3 4−5
−3650%
150−160
+3650%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−3650%
300−310
+3650%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−3650%
150−160
+3650%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−3233%
300−310
+3233%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−3650%
1050−1100
+3650%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−3567%
110−120
+3567%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−3650%
75−80
+3650%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−3650%
75−80
+3650%
Hitman 3 4−5
−3650%
150−160
+3650%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−3650%
300−310
+3650%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−3650%
150−160
+3650%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−3233%
300−310
+3233%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−3650%
1050−1100
+3650%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Hitman 3 6−7
−3567%
220−230
+3567%
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3
−3650%
75−80
+3650%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−3650%
75−80
+3650%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−3400%
35−40
+3400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−3650%
75−80
+3650%

This is how HD Graphics 2000 and Pro W6400 compete in popular games:

  • Pro W6400 is 3536% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.55 20.95
Recency 1 February 2011 19 January 2022
Chip lithography 32 nm 6 nm

Pro W6400 has a 3709.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, and a 433.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon Pro W6400 is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 2000 in performance tests.

Be aware that HD Graphics 2000 is a desktop card while Radeon Pro W6400 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 2000
HD Graphics 2000
AMD Radeon Pro W6400
Radeon Pro W6400

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 1282 votes

Rate HD Graphics 2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 28 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W6400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.