GeForce RTX 5090 vs Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) with GeForce RTX 5090, including specs and performance data.

Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
2023
9.91

RTX 5090 outperforms Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) by a whopping 909% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking4431
Place by popularitynot in top-10059
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data11.28
Power efficiencyno data12.54
ArchitectureXe LPG (2023)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameMeteor Lake iGPUGB202
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date14 December 2023 (1 year ago)30 January 2025 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores421760
Core clock speedno data2017 MHz
Boost clock speed1950 MHz2407 MHz
Number of transistorsno data92,200 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data575 Watt
Texture fill rateno data1,637
Floating-point processing powerno data104.8 TFLOPS
ROPsno data176
TMUsno data680
Tensor Coresno data680
Ray Tracing Coresno data170

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data304 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR7
Maximum RAM amountno data32 GB
Memory bus widthno data512 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data1.79 TB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.4
CUDA-10.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD25
−728%
207
+728%
1440p18−20
−922%
184
+922%
4K12−14
−1075%
141
+1075%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data9.66
1440pno data10.86
4Kno data14.18

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 13
−1385%
190−200
+1385%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
−244%
110−120
+244%
Counter-Strike 2 11
−1655%
190−200
+1655%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−852%
400−450
+852%
Forza Horizon 4 50
−900%
500−550
+900%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27
−773%
220−230
+773%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
−900%
800−850
+900%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
−478%
150−160
+478%
Valorant 40−45
−1158%
500−550
+1158%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
−244%
110−120
+244%
Counter-Strike 2 13
−1385%
190−200
+1385%
Dota 2 15
−1060%
170−180
+1060%
Far Cry 5 24
−563%
159
+563%
Fortnite 60−65
−413%
300−350
+413%
Forza Horizon 4 39
−797%
350−400
+797%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27
−773%
220−230
+773%
Grand Theft Auto V 15
−900%
150−160
+900%
Metro Exodus 27−30
−479%
160−170
+479%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
−169%
210−220
+169%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
−478%
150−160
+478%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
−461%
170−180
+461%
Valorant 40−45
−1158%
500−550
+1158%
World of Tanks 140−150
−88.5%
270−280
+88.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
−244%
110−120
+244%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
−1022%
202
+1022%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−269%
150−160
+269%
Fortnite 60−65
−900%
600−650
+900%
Forza Horizon 4 30
−900%
300−310
+900%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27
−773%
220−230
+773%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
−169%
210−220
+169%
Valorant 40−45
−1158%
500−550
+1158%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 14−16
−1021%
150−160
+1021%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−900%
140−150
+900%
Metro Exodus 20−22
−900%
200−210
+900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
−842%
650−700
+842%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−933%
90−95
+933%
World of Tanks 70−75
−597%
500−550
+597%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 20−22
−335%
85−90
+335%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−596%
160−170
+596%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−900%
240−250
+900%
Forza Horizon 5 16−18
−988%
170−180
+988%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−900%
140−150
+900%
Valorant 24−27
−1492%
400−450
+1492%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−1640%
174
+1640%
Dota 2 21−24
−767%
180−190
+767%
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
−900%
200−210
+900%
Metro Exodus 6−7
−2683%
167
+2683%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−814%
60−65
+814%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
−900%
200−210
+900%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
−911%
90−95
+911%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−450%
55
+450%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−708%
100−110
+708%
Fortnite 10−12
−773%
95−100
+773%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−900%
130−140
+900%
Forza Horizon 5 7−8
−1500%
110−120
+1500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
−900%
300−310
+900%
Valorant 10−11
−2330%
240−250
+2330%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Metro Exodus 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 183
+0%
183
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Metro Exodus 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

4K
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%

This is how Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) and RTX 5090 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 5090 is 728% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 5090 is 922% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 5090 is 1075% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 5090 is 2683% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 5090 is ahead in 41 test (91%)
  • there's a draw in 4 tests (9%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.91 100.00
Recency 14 December 2023 30 January 2025

RTX 5090 has a 909.1% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 1 year.

The GeForce RTX 5090 is our recommended choice as it beats the Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) in performance tests.

Be aware that Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 5090 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
GeForce RTX 5090

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.1 10 votes

Rate Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 1490 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 5090 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.