Radeon R7 A360 vs GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE

Place in the ranking	1494	963
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Architecture	Kelvin (2001−2003)	GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code name	NV28 A2	Meso
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	16 February 2003 (21 year ago)	5 May 2015 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	no data	384
Core clock speed	275 MHz	1100 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1125 MHz
Number of transistors	36 million	1,550 million
Manufacturing process technology	150 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	2.200	27.00
Floating-point processing power	no data	0.864 TFLOPS
ROPs	4	8
TMUs	8	24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	AGP 8x	PCIe 3.0 x8
Length	216 mm	no data
Width	1-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	SDR	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount	128 MB	2 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	275 MHz	900 MHz
Memory bandwidth	4.4 GB/s	14.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	8.1	12 (12_0)
Shader Model	no data	6.0
OpenGL	1.3	4.6
OpenCL	N/A	2.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE 0.02

R7 A360 1.57
+7750%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE 6

R7 A360 607
+10017%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.02	1.57
Recency	16 February 2003	5 May 2015
Maximum RAM amount	128 MB	2 GB
Chip lithography	150 nm	28 nm

R7 A360 has a 7750% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 435.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon R7 A360 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE is a desktop card while Radeon R7 A360 is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.