Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile vs GeForce4 460 Go

Place in the ranking	1500	200
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	no data	54.31
Architecture	Celsius (1999−2005)	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code name	NV17 A5	AD107
Market segment	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Release date	14 October 2002 (22 years ago)	26 February 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2	2048
Core clock speed	250 MHz	1485 MHz
Boost clock speed	250 MHz	2025 MHz
Number of transistors	29 million	18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology	150 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	35 Watt
Texture fill rate	1.000	129.6
Floating-point processing power	no data	8.294 TFLOPS
ROPs	2	32
TMUs	4	64
Tensor Cores	no data	64
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Interface	AGP 4x	PCIe 4.0 x8

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	64 MB	4 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	250 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	8 GB/s	128.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Portable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	8.0	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	no data	6.8
OpenGL	1.3	4.6
OpenCL	N/A	3.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.3
CUDA	-	8.9

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

2−3

−272400%

5450−5500
+272400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −271567%	8150−8200 +271567%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −272400%	5450−5500 +272400%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −272400%	5450−5500 +272400%
Hitman 3	4−5 −272400%	10900−10950 +272400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −272400%	21800−21850 +272400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −272400%	10900−10950 +272400%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −272579%	76350−76400 +272579%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −271567%	8150−8200 +271567%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −272400%	5450−5500 +272400%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −272400%	5450−5500 +272400%
Hitman 3	4−5 −272400%	10900−10950 +272400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −272400%	21800−21850 +272400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −272400%	10900−10950 +272400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −272122%	24500−24550 +272122%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −272579%	76350−76400 +272579%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −271567%	8150−8200 +271567%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −272400%	5450−5500 +272400%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −272400%	5450−5500 +272400%
Hitman 3	4−5 −272400%	10900−10950 +272400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −272400%	21800−21850 +272400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −272400%	10900−10950 +272400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −272122%	24500−24550 +272122%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −272579%	76350−76400 +272579%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Hitman 3	6−7 −272400%	16350−16400 +272400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	2−3 −272400%	5450−5500 +272400%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−272400%

5450−5500
+272400%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −269900%	2700−2750 +269900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−272400%

5450−5500
+272400%

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.01	27.27
Recency	14 October 2002	26 February 2024
Maximum RAM amount	64 MB	4 GB
Chip lithography	150 nm	5 nm

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile has a 272600% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 21 year, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2900% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce4 460 Go in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce4 460 Go is a notebook graphics card while RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.