Sony Playstation Portable GPU 65nm vs GeForce RTX 4090

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1not rated
Place by popularity6not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation18.79no data
Power efficiency15.36no data
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)no data
GPU code nameAD102RE+SE-65nm
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date20 September 2022 (2 years ago)30 August 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,599 $249

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16384no data
Core clock speed2235 MHz133 MHz
Boost clock speed2520 MHzno data
Number of transistors76,300 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology5 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)450 Watt4 Watt
Texture fill rate1,2900.67
Floating-point processing power82.58 TFLOPSno data
ROPs1765
TMUs5125
Tensor Cores512no data
Ray Tracing Cores128no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16no data
Length304 mm169 mm
Width3-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 16-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6XeDRAM
Maximum RAM amount24 GB2 MB
Memory bus width384 Bit512 Bit
Memory clock speed1313 MHz83 MHz
Memory bandwidth1.01 TB/s5.312 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4aNo outputs
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)N/A
Shader Model6.8no data
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL3.0N/A
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA8.9-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 20 September 2022 30 August 2007
Maximum RAM amount 24 GB 2 MB
Chip lithography 5 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 450 Watt 4 Watt

RTX 4090 has an age advantage of 15 years, a 1228700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1200% more advanced lithography process.

Sony Playstation Portable GPU 65nm, on the other hand, has 11150% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce RTX 4090 and Sony Playstation Portable GPU 65nm. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
GeForce RTX 4090
Sony Playstation Portable GPU 65nm
Sony Playstation Portable GPU 65nm

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 14119 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4090 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Sony Playstation Portable GPU 65nm on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.