Sony Playstation Portable GPU 65nm vs GeForce RTX 4070

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking20not rated
Place by popularity32not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation59.10no data
Power efficiency23.98no data
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)no data
GPU code nameAD104RE+SE-65nm
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date12 April 2023 (1 year ago)30 August 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$599 $249

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5888no data
Core clock speed1920 MHz133 MHz
Boost clock speed2475 MHzno data
Number of transistors35,800 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology5 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt4 Watt
Texture fill rate455.40.67
Floating-point processing power29.15 TFLOPSno data
ROPs645
TMUs1845
Tensor Cores184no data
Ray Tracing Cores46no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16no data
Length240 mm169 mm
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 16-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6XeDRAM
Maximum RAM amount12 GB2 MB
Memory bus width192 Bit512 Bit
Memory clock speed1313 MHz83 MHz
Memory bandwidth504.2 GB/s5.312 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4aNo outputs
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)N/A
Shader Model6.7no data
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL3.0N/A
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA8.9-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 April 2023 30 August 2007
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 2 MB
Chip lithography 5 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 4 Watt

RTX 4070 has an age advantage of 15 years, a 614300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1200% more advanced lithography process.

Sony Playstation Portable GPU 65nm, on the other hand, has 4900% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce RTX 4070 and Sony Playstation Portable GPU 65nm. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070
GeForce RTX 4070
Sony Playstation Portable GPU 65nm
Sony Playstation Portable GPU 65nm

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 9263 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4070 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Sony Playstation Portable GPU 65nm on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.