Radeon PRO W7800 vs GeForce RTX 4080

Place in performance ranking	2	12
Place by popularity	91	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	17.07	8.72
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	RDNA 3.0 (2022)
GPU code name	AD103-300-A1	Navi 31
Market segment	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	20 September 2022 (1 year ago)	13 April 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$1,199	$2,499
Current price	$1451 (1.2x MSRP)	$3907 (1.6x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 4080 has 96% better value for money than PRO W7800.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	9728	4480
Core clock speed	2205 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	2505 MHz	2499 MHz
Number of transistors	45,900 million	57,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	5 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	320 Watt	260 Watt
Texture fill rate	761.5	699.7

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	310 mm	280 mm
Width	3-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 16-pin	2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6X	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	32 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	22400 MHz	18 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	716.8 GB/s	576.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a	3x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.6	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	2.2
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
CUDA	8.9	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 4080 89.47
+19.4%

PRO W7800 74.96

GeForce RTX 4080 outperforms Radeon PRO W7800 by 19% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RTX 4080 34623
+19.4%

PRO W7800 29006

GeForce RTX 4080 outperforms Radeon PRO W7800 by 19% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	245 +22.5%	200−210 −22.5%
1440p	176 +25.7%	140−150 −25.7%
4K	113 +25.6%	90−95 −25.6%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

231
+21.6%

190−200

−21.6%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	130−140 +25.5%	110−120 −25.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	262 +24.8%	210−220 −24.8%
Battlefield 5	180−190 +20%	150−160 −20%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	170−180 +27.1%	140−150 −27.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	231 +21.6%	190−200 −21.6%
Far Cry 5	223 +23.9%	180−190 −23.9%
Far Cry New Dawn	173 +23.6%	140−150 −23.6%
Forza Horizon 4	260−270 +19.5%	220−230 −19.5%
Hitman 3	210−220 +21.7%	180−190 −21.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	190−200 +24.4%	160−170 −24.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2	150−160 +20.8%	130−140 −20.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	309 +23.6%	250−260 −23.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion	191 +19.4%	160−170 −19.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	130−140 +25.5%	110−120 −25.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	217 +20.6%	180−190 −20.6%
Battlefield 5	180−190 +20%	150−160 −20%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	170−180 +27.1%	140−150 −27.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	210 +23.5%	170−180 −23.5%
Far Cry 5	218 +21.1%	180−190 −21.1%
Far Cry New Dawn	166 +27.7%	130−140 −27.7%
Forza Horizon 4	260−270 +19.5%	220−230 −19.5%
Hitman 3	210−220 +21.7%	180−190 −21.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	190−200 +24.4%	160−170 −24.4%
Metro Exodus	213 +25.3%	170−180 −25.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	150−160 +20.8%	130−140 −20.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	306 +22.4%	250−260 −22.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	547 +21.6%	450−500 −21.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion	173 +23.6%	140−150 −23.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	130−140 +25.5%	110−120 −25.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	189 +26%	150−160 −26%
Battlefield 5	180−190 +20%	150−160 −20%
Cyberpunk 2077	190 +26.7%	150−160 −26.7%
Far Cry 5	204 +20%	170−180 −20%
Far Cry New Dawn	150 +25%	120−130 −25%
Forza Horizon 4	260−270 +19.5%	220−230 −19.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	258 +22.9%	210−220 −22.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion	164 +26.2%	130−140 −26.2%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	140−150 +24.2%	120−130 −24.2%
Hitman 3	210−220 +25.3%	170−180 −25.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	160−170 +26.9%	130−140 −26.9%
Metro Exodus	154 +28.3%	120−130 −28.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	90−95 +24%	75−80 −24%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	247 +23.5%	200−210 −23.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	100−110 +23.5%	85−90 −23.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	153 +27.5%	120−130 −27.5%
Battlefield 5	170−180 +27.1%	140−150 −27.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	129 +29%	100−105 −29%
Far Cry 5	201 +25.6%	160−170 −25.6%
Far Cry New Dawn	149 +24.2%	120−130 −24.2%
Forza Horizon 4	230−240 +23.7%	190−200 −23.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	210 +23.5%	170−180 −23.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion	142 +29.1%	110−120 −29.1%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	95−100 +20%	80−85 −20%
Hitman 3	120−130 +28%	100−105 −28%
Horizon Zero Dawn	110−120 +22.1%	95−100 −22.1%
Metro Exodus	105 +23.5%	85−90 −23.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	60−65 +28%	50−55 −28%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	133 +20.9%	110−120 −20.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	202 +26.3%	160−170 −26.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	75−80 +20%	65−70 −20%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	100 +25%	80−85 −25%
Battlefield 5	130−140 +20%	110−120 −20%
Cyberpunk 2077	63 +26%	50−55 −26%
Far Cry 5	140 +27.3%	110−120 −27.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	130 +30%	100−105 −30%
Forza Horizon 4	190−200 +21.9%	160−170 −21.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion	87 +24.3%	70−75 −24.3%

This is how RTX 4080 and PRO W7800 compete in popular games:

RTX 4080 is 23% faster in 1080p
RTX 4080 is 26% faster in 1440p
RTX 4080 is 26% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	89.47	74.96
Recency	20 September 2022	13 April 2023
Cost	$1199	$2499
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	32 GB
Power consumption (TDP)	320 Watt	260 Watt