RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile with RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation, including specs and performance data.

RTX 4070 Mobile
2023
8 GB GDDR6, 115 Watt
50.87

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation outperforms RTX 4070 Mobile by a small 6% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking5547
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency30.3152.82
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameAD106AD104
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date3 January 2023 (1 year ago)21 March 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores46086144
Core clock speed1395 MHz720 MHz
Boost clock speed1695 MHz1560 MHz
Number of transistorsno data35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)115 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate244.1299.5
Floating-point processing power15.62 TFLOPS19.17 TFLOPS
ROPs4880
TMUs144192
Tensor Cores144192
Ray Tracing Cores3648

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB20 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit160 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth256.0 GB/s280.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.98.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 4070 Mobile 50.87
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 53.96
+6.1%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 4070 Mobile 19605
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 20796
+6.1%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD130
+0%
130−140
+0%
1440p75
+0%
75−80
+0%
4K46
+2.2%
45−50
−2.2%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 133
−5.3%
140−150
+5.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 95−100
−5.3%
100−105
+5.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 75−80
−2.6%
80−85
+2.6%
Battlefield 5 140−150
−4.2%
150−160
+4.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 90−95
−5.6%
95−100
+5.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 116
−3.4%
120−130
+3.4%
Far Cry 5 90−95
−1.1%
95−100
+1.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210
−2.9%
210−220
+2.9%
Hitman 3 95−100
−3.1%
100−105
+3.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 180−190
−4.4%
190−200
+4.4%
Metro Exodus 130−140
−1.4%
140−150
+1.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 170−180
−5.9%
180−190
+5.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
−2.9%
140−150
+2.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 95−100
−5.3%
100−105
+5.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 75−80
−2.6%
80−85
+2.6%
Battlefield 5 140−150
−4.2%
150−160
+4.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 90−95
−5.6%
95−100
+5.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 98
−2%
100−105
+2%
Far Cry 5 90−95
−1.1%
95−100
+1.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210
−2.9%
210−220
+2.9%
Hitman 3 95−100
−3.1%
100−105
+3.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 180−190
−4.4%
190−200
+4.4%
Metro Exodus 130−140
−1.4%
140−150
+1.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 233
−3%
240−250
+3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 90−95
−2.2%
95−100
+2.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
−2.9%
140−150
+2.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 95−100
−5.3%
100−105
+5.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 101
+1%
100−105
−1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 90−95
−5.6%
95−100
+5.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 87
−3.4%
90−95
+3.4%
Far Cry 5 90−95
−1.1%
95−100
+1.1%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210
−2.9%
210−220
+2.9%
Hitman 3 95−100
−3.1%
100−105
+3.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 183
−3.8%
190−200
+3.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 204
−2.9%
210−220
+2.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 116
−3.4%
120−130
+3.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 89
−1.1%
90−95
+1.1%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
−1.1%
90−95
+1.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
−1.4%
70−75
+1.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 75
+0%
75−80
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
−3.8%
55−60
+3.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 54
−1.9%
55−60
+1.9%
Far Cry 5 50−55
−5.8%
55−60
+5.8%
Forza Horizon 4 240−250
−2.5%
250−260
+2.5%
Hitman 3 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 143
−4.9%
150−160
+4.9%
Metro Exodus 105
−4.8%
110−120
+4.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 134
−4.5%
140−150
+4.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 88
−2.3%
90−95
+2.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 200−210
−1.4%
210−220
+1.4%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 75−80
−2.6%
80−85
+2.6%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+2.2%
45−50
−2.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
−2.6%
40−45
+2.6%
Hitman 3 35−40
+5.7%
35−40
−5.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 190−200
−1.5%
200−210
+1.5%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70
+0%
70−75
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
+6.7%
30−33
−6.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 42
+5%
40−45
−5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 23
−4.3%
24−27
+4.3%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
−1.6%
65−70
+1.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 73
−2.7%
75−80
+2.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 33
−6.1%
35−40
+6.1%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+2.5%
40−45
−2.5%

This is how RTX 4070 Mobile and RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation compete in popular games:

  • A tie in 1080p
  • A tie in 1440p
  • RTX 4070 Mobile is 2% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 50.87 53.96
Recency 3 January 2023 21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 20 GB
Chip lithography 4 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 115 Watt 70 Watt

RTX 4070 Mobile has a 25% more advanced lithography process.

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation, on the other hand, has a 6.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 months, a 150% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 64.3% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile and RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile is a notebook card while RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1765 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 49 votes

Rate RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.