Radeon 780M vs GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

RTX 4070 Ti
2023
12 GB GDDR6X, 285 Watt
82.19
+348%

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti outperforms Radeon 780M by a whopping 348% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking5283
Place by popularity7557
Cost-effectiveness evaluation29.56no data
ArchitectureAda LovelaceRDNA 3
GPU code nameAD104-400Phoenix
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date3 January 2023 (1 year ago)5 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$799 no data
Current price$837 (1x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7680768
Core clock speed2310 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speed2610 MHz3000 MHz
Number of transistors35,800 million25,390 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)285 Watt54 Watt (35 - 54 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate626.4139.2

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and Radeon 780M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length336 mmno data
Width3-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 12-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6XSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount12 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width192 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed21000 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth504.2 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4aPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.1
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.9no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 4070 Ti 82.19
+348%
Radeon 780M 18.35

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti outperforms Radeon 780M by 348% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RTX 4070 Ti 31774
+348%
Radeon 780M 7095

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti outperforms Radeon 780M by 348% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RTX 4070 Ti 75612
+509%
Radeon 780M 12413

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti outperforms Radeon 780M by 509% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RTX 4070 Ti 135624
+232%
Radeon 780M 40817

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti outperforms Radeon 780M by 232% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RTX 4070 Ti 53360
+572%
Radeon 780M 7935

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti outperforms Radeon 780M by 572% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RTX 4070 Ti 217200
+352%
Radeon 780M 48105

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti outperforms Radeon 780M by 352% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 8%

RTX 4070 Ti 815367
+89.7%
Radeon 780M 429810

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti outperforms Radeon 780M by 90% in 3DMark Ice Storm GPU.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04

Benchmark coverage: 3%

RTX 4070 Ti 291
+334%
Radeon 780M 67

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti outperforms Radeon 780M by 334% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03

Benchmark coverage: 3%

RTX 4070 Ti 119
+9.7%
Radeon 780M 108

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti outperforms Radeon 780M by 10% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02

Benchmark coverage: 3%

RTX 4070 Ti 19
Radeon 780M 73
+280%

Radeon 780M outperforms GeForce RTX 4070 Ti by 280% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04

Benchmark coverage: 3%

RTX 4070 Ti 193
+148%
Radeon 780M 78

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti outperforms Radeon 780M by 148% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

RTX 4070 Ti 99
+98.2%
Radeon 780M 50

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti outperforms Radeon 780M by 98% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

RTX 4070 Ti 154
+142%
Radeon 780M 63

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti outperforms Radeon 780M by 142% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

RTX 4070 Ti 245
+740%
Radeon 780M 29

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti outperforms Radeon 780M by 740% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

RTX 4070 Ti 48
+58.4%
Radeon 780M 31

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti outperforms Radeon 780M by 58% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05

Benchmark coverage: 2%

RTX 4070 Ti 438
+439%
Radeon 780M 81

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti outperforms Radeon 780M by 439% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD229
+536%
36
−536%
1440p151
+619%
21
−619%
4K94
+571%
14
−571%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 236
+505%
39
−505%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 120−130
+238%
35−40
−238%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 140−150
+381%
30−35
−381%
Battlefield 5 240−250
+307%
60−65
−307%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 150−160
+298%
40−45
−298%
Cyberpunk 2077 218
+603%
31
−603%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+148%
45−50
−148%
Far Cry New Dawn 150−160
+198%
50−55
−198%
Forza Horizon 4 240−250
+313%
60−65
−313%
Hitman 3 150−160
+249%
40−45
−249%
Horizon Zero Dawn 467
+372%
99
−372%
Metro Exodus 140−150
+155%
55−60
−155%
Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
+143%
50−55
−143%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 575
+798%
64
−798%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
+232%
41
−232%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 120−130
+238%
35−40
−238%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 140−150
+381%
30−35
−381%
Battlefield 5 240−250
+307%
60−65
−307%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 150−160
+298%
40−45
−298%
Cyberpunk 2077 185
+671%
24
−671%
Far Cry 5 152
+390%
31
−390%
Far Cry New Dawn 83
+295%
21
−295%
Forza Horizon 4 240−250
+313%
60−65
−313%
Hitman 3 150−160
+249%
40−45
−249%
Horizon Zero Dawn 452
+479%
78
−479%
Metro Exodus 167
+307%
41
−307%
Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
+143%
50−55
−143%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 373
+767%
43
−767%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 453
+885%
46
−885%
Watch Dogs: Legion 176
+433%
33
−433%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 120−130
+238%
35−40
−238%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 140−150
+381%
30−35
−381%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 150−160
+298%
40−45
−298%
Cyberpunk 2077 167
+626%
23
−626%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+148%
45−50
−148%
Forza Horizon 4 240−250
+313%
60−65
−313%
Horizon Zero Dawn 351
+550%
54
−550%
Metro Exodus 150
+285%
39
−285%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 222
+666%
29
−666%
Watch Dogs: Legion 152
+744%
18
−744%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
+143%
50−55
−143%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 160−170
+374%
35−40
−374%
Far Cry New Dawn 140−150
+300%
35−40
−300%
Hitman 3 100−110
+296%
27−30
−296%
Red Dead Redemption 2 85−90
+521%
14−16
−521%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 90−95
+395%
18−20
−395%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 100−110
+575%
16−18
−575%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 110−120
+387%
21−24
−387%
Cyberpunk 2077 105
+950%
10−11
−950%
Far Cry 5 182
+574%
27
−574%
Forza Horizon 4 210−220
+492%
35−40
−492%
Horizon Zero Dawn 273
+638%
35−40
−638%
Metro Exodus 148
+335%
30−35
−335%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 280
+775%
32
−775%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 150−160
+695%
20
−695%
Watch Dogs: Legion 121
+908%
12−14
−908%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5 130
+400%
26
−400%
Far Cry New Dawn 140−150
+610%
20−22
−610%
Hitman 3 75−80
+443%
14−16
−443%
Horizon Zero Dawn 130−140
+580%
20−22
−580%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 104
+767%
12−14
−767%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 149
+893%
15
−893%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 65−70
+527%
10−12
−527%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 65−70
+667%
9−10
−667%
Battlefield 5 110−120
+448%
21−24
−448%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 90−95
+592%
12−14
−592%
Cyberpunk 2077 48
+1500%
3−4
−1500%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+564%
24−27
−564%
Horizon Zero Dawn 161
+705%
20−22
−705%
Metro Exodus 112
+559%
16−18
−559%
Watch Dogs: Legion 68
+871%
7−8
−871%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 95−100
+519%
16−18
−519%

This is how RTX 4070 Ti and Radeon 780M compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4070 Ti is 536% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4070 Ti is 619% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4070 Ti is 571% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 4070 Ti is 1500% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RTX 4070 Ti surpassed Radeon 780M in all 72 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 82.19 18.35
Chip lithography 5 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 285 Watt 54 Watt

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 780M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is a desktop card while Radeon 780M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
AMD Radeon 780M
Radeon 780M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 6185 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4070 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 1044 votes

Rate Radeon 780M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.