ATI Radeon X1650 SE vs GeForce RTX 4060

Place in the ranking	54	1405
Place by popularity	2	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	100.00	no data
Power efficiency	30.82	0.48
Architecture	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)	Ultra-Threaded SE (2005−2007)
GPU code name	AD107	RV515
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	18 May 2023 (1 year ago)	2007 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$299	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	3072	no data
Core clock speed	1830 MHz	635 MHz
Boost clock speed	2460 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	18,900 million	107 million
Manufacturing process technology	5 nm	90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	115 Watt	27 Watt
Texture fill rate	236.2	2.540
Floating-point processing power	15.11 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	48	4
TMUs	96	4
Tensor Cores	96	no data
Ray Tracing Cores	24	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x8	PCIe 1.0 x16
Length	240 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 12-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	DDR2
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	512 MB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	2125 MHz	800 MBps
Memory bandwidth	272.0 GB/s	12.8 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a	1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
HDMI	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model	6.8	3.0
OpenGL	4.6	2.1
OpenCL	3.0	N/A
Vulkan	1.3	N/A
CUDA	8.9	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 4060 49.53
+27417%

ATI X1650 SE 0.18

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 4060 19793
+27777%

ATI X1650 SE 71

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	137	-0−1
1440p	70	-0−1
4K	40	-0−1

Cost per frame, $

1080p	2.18	no data
1440p	4.27	no data
4K	7.48	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	135	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	139	0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	109	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	54	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	272	0−1
Forza Horizon 5	130−140	0−1
Metro Exodus	165	0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2	95−100	0−1
Valorant	210−220	0−1

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	91	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	45	0−1
Dota 2	155	0−1
Far Cry 5	149	0−1
Fortnite	200−210	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	217	0−1
Forza Horizon 5	130−140	0−1
Grand Theft Auto V	158	0−1
Metro Exodus	118	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	210−220	0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2	95−100	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	170−180	0−1
Valorant	210−220	0−1
World of Tanks	270−280 +27800%	1−2 −27800%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	76	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	40	0−1
Far Cry 5	110−120	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	190	0−1
Forza Horizon 5	130−140	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	210−220	0−1
Valorant	210−220	0−1

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	30−35	0−1
Dota 2	90	0−1
Grand Theft Auto V	90	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180	0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2	55−60	0−1
World of Tanks	300−350 +32900%	1−2 −32900%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	80−85	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	24	0−1
Far Cry 5	150−160	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	129	0−1
Forza Horizon 5	90−95	0−1
Metro Exodus	111	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	100−105	0−1
Valorant	180−190	0−1

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	27−30	0−1
Dota 2	89	0−1
Grand Theft Auto V	89	0−1
Metro Exodus	38	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180	0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2	35−40	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	89	0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	60−65	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	9	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	10	0−1
Far Cry 5	85−90	0−1
Fortnite	80−85	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	70	0−1
Forza Horizon 5	50−55	0−1
Valorant	100−110	0−1