ATI Radeon X1650 SE vs GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

Place in the ranking	6	1405
Place by popularity	91	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	48.97	no data
Power efficiency	19.97	0.46
Architecture	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)	Ultra-Threaded SE (2005−2007)
GPU code name	AD104	RV515
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	3 January 2023 (2 years ago)	2007 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$799	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	7680	no data
Core clock speed	2310 MHz	635 MHz
Boost clock speed	2610 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	35,800 million	107 million
Manufacturing process technology	4 nm	90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	285 Watt	27 Watt
Texture fill rate	626.4	2.540
Floating-point processing power	40.09 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	80	4
TMUs	240	4
Tensor Cores	240	no data
Ray Tracing Cores	60	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 1.0 x16
Length	285 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 16-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6X	DDR2
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	512 MB
Memory bus width	192 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1313 MHz	800 MBps
Memory bandwidth	504.2 GB/s	12.8 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a	1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
HDMI	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model	6.7	3.0
OpenGL	4.6	2.1
OpenCL	3.0	N/A
Vulkan	1.3	N/A
CUDA	8.9	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 4070 Ti 79.51
+44072%

ATI X1650 SE 0.18

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 4070 Ti 31775
+44654%

ATI X1650 SE 71

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	231	0−1
1440p	150	-0−1
4K	96	-0−1

Cost per frame, $

1080p	3.46	no data
1440p	5.33	no data
4K	8.32	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	190−200	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	236	0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	190−200	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	109	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	575 +57400%	1−2 −57400%
Forza Horizon 5	220−230	0−1
Metro Exodus	173	0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2	150−160	0−1
Valorant	450−500 +49400%	1−2 −49400%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	190−200	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	93	0−1
Dota 2	205	0−1
Far Cry 5	152	0−1
Fortnite	300−350	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	473 +47200%	1−2 −47200%
Forza Horizon 5	220−230	0−1
Grand Theft Auto V	178	0−1
Metro Exodus	163	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	210−220	0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2	150−160	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	170−180	0−1
Valorant	450−500 +49400%	1−2 −49400%
World of Tanks	270−280	0−1

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	190−200	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	83	0−1
Dota 2	243	0−1
Far Cry 5	150−160	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	410	0−1
Forza Horizon 5	220−230	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	210−220	0−1
Valorant	450−500 +49400%	1−2 −49400%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	30−35	0−1
Dota 2	156	0−1
Grand Theft Auto V	156	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180	0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2	90−95	0−1
World of Tanks	500−550 +51500%	1−2 −51500%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	85−90	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	53	0−1
Far Cry 5	160−170	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	280	0−1
Forza Horizon 5	170−180	0−1
Metro Exodus	148	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	190−200	0−1
Valorant	400−450	0−1

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	60−65	0−1
Dota 2	172	0−1
Grand Theft Auto V	172	0−1
Metro Exodus	84	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	200−210	0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2	60−65	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	172	0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	90−95	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	60−65	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	24	0−1
Dota 2	226	0−1
Far Cry 5	100−110	0−1
Fortnite	95−100	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	140	0−1
Forza Horizon 5	110−120	0−1
Valorant	240−250	0−1