GeForce RTX 3060 8 GB vs RTX 2050 Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile with GeForce RTX 3060 8 GB, including specs and performance data.

RTX 2050 Mobile
2021
4 GB GDDR6, 45 Watt
18.62

RTX 3060 8 GB outperforms RTX 2050 Mobile by a whopping 113% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking305111
Place by popularity29not in top-100
Power efficiency28.5516.13
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGA107GA106
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date17 December 2021 (3 years ago)12 October 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20483584
Core clock speed1185 MHz1320 MHz
Boost clock speed1477 MHz1777 MHz
Number of transistorsno data12,000 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt170 Watt
Texture fill rate94.53199.0
Floating-point processing power6.05 TFLOPS12.74 TFLOPS
ROPs3248
TMUs64112
Tensor Cores256112
Ray Tracing Cores3228

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data242 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 12-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1875 MHz
Memory bandwidth112.0 GB/s240.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI++
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.68.6
DLSS++

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD41
−107%
85−90
+107%
1440p34
−106%
70−75
+106%
4K26
−112%
55−60
+112%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 45−50
−107%
95−100
+107%
Counter-Strike 2 36
−108%
75−80
+108%
Cyberpunk 2077 47
−113%
100−105
+113%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 49
−104%
100−105
+104%
Battlefield 5 70−75
−103%
150−160
+103%
Counter-Strike 2 30
−100%
60−65
+100%
Cyberpunk 2077 42
−102%
85−90
+102%
Far Cry 5 59
−103%
120−130
+103%
Fortnite 95−100
−111%
200−210
+111%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
−108%
150−160
+108%
Forza Horizon 5 49
−104%
100−105
+104%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
−112%
140−150
+112%
Valorant 130−140
−107%
280−290
+107%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 30
−100%
60−65
+100%
Battlefield 5 70−75
−103%
150−160
+103%
Counter-Strike 2 27
−104%
55−60
+104%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 220−230
−105%
450−500
+105%
Cyberpunk 2077 29
−107%
60−65
+107%
Dota 2 118
−112%
250−260
+112%
Far Cry 5 53
−108%
110−120
+108%
Fortnite 95−100
−111%
200−210
+111%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
−108%
150−160
+108%
Forza Horizon 5 45−50
−104%
100−105
+104%
Grand Theft Auto V 68
−106%
140−150
+106%
Metro Exodus 35−40
−103%
75−80
+103%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
−112%
140−150
+112%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 58
−107%
120−130
+107%
Valorant 130−140
−107%
280−290
+107%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
−103%
150−160
+103%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
−103%
65−70
+103%
Cyberpunk 2077 25
−100%
50−55
+100%
Dota 2 110
−109%
230−240
+109%
Far Cry 5 49
−104%
100−105
+104%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
−108%
150−160
+108%
Forza Horizon 5 33
−112%
70−75
+112%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
−112%
140−150
+112%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 33
−112%
70−75
+112%
Valorant 130−140
−107%
280−290
+107%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 95−100
−111%
200−210
+111%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 120−130
−111%
270−280
+111%
Grand Theft Auto V 37
−103%
75−80
+103%
Metro Exodus 21−24
−105%
45−50
+105%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
−111%
350−400
+111%
Valorant 170−180
−105%
350−400
+105%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
−100%
100−105
+100%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
−111%
40−45
+111%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−87.5%
30−33
+87.5%
Far Cry 5 37
−103%
75−80
+103%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−105%
90−95
+105%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
−103%
65−70
+103%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
−96.4%
55−60
+96.4%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 40−45
−113%
85−90
+113%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 14−16
−92.9%
27−30
+92.9%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−100%
16−18
+100%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
−103%
65−70
+103%
Metro Exodus 14−16
−92.9%
27−30
+92.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−100%
50−55
+100%
Valorant 95−100
−104%
200−210
+104%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
−112%
55−60
+112%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−100%
16−18
+100%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−100%
14−16
+100%
Dota 2 34
−106%
70−75
+106%
Far Cry 5 18
−94.4%
35−40
+94.4%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−110%
65−70
+110%
Forza Horizon 5 14−16
−100%
30−33
+100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−106%
35−40
+106%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 18−20
−94.4%
35−40
+94.4%

This is how RTX 2050 Mobile and RTX 3060 8 GB compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3060 8 GB is 107% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3060 8 GB is 106% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3060 8 GB is 112% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 18.62 39.75
Recency 17 December 2021 12 October 2022
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 170 Watt

RTX 2050 Mobile has 277.8% lower power consumption.

RTX 3060 8 GB, on the other hand, has a 113.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 months, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

The GeForce RTX 3060 8 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 3060 8 GB is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
GeForce RTX 2050
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 8 GB
GeForce RTX 3060 8 GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 2437 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 792 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3060 8 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile or GeForce RTX 3060 8 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.