Radeon RX 5300 vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB

Place in performance ranking	29	263
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	30.03	7.24
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code name	AD106	Navi 14
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	18 May 2023 (1 year ago)	28 May 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$499	no data
Current price	$615 (1.2x MSRP)	$558

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB has 315% better value for money than RX 5300.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	4352	1408
Core clock speed	2310 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	2535 MHz	1645 MHz
Number of transistors	22,900 million	6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	5 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	165 Watt	100 Watt
Texture fill rate	344.8	144.8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x8	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	240 mm	180 mm
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 16-pin	1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	3 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	96 Bit
Memory clock speed	18000 MHz	14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	288.0 GB/s	168.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI	+	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.7	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	2.0
Vulkan	1.3	1.2.131
CUDA	8.9	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB 59.34
+200%

RX 5300 19.79

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB outperforms Radeon RX 5300 by 200% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB 22918
+200%

RX 5300 7641

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB outperforms Radeon RX 5300 by 200% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	166 +202%	55−60 −202%
1440p	92 +207%	30−35 −207%
4K	54 +200%	18−20 −200%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	290−300 +199%	95−100 −199%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	300−310 +191%	100−110 −191%
Battlefield 5	550−600 +191%	180−190 −191%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	300−310 +170%	110−120 −170%
Far Cry 5	300−310 +170%	110−120 −170%
Far Cry New Dawn	400−450 +180%	140−150 −180%
Forza Horizon 4	550−600 +184%	190−200 −184%
Hitman 3	300−310 +163%	110−120 −163%
Horizon Zero Dawn	1150−1200 +191%	395 −191%
Metro Exodus	400−450 +192%	130−140 −192%
Red Dead Redemption 2	350−400 +194%	110−120 −194%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	1000−1050 +191%	344 −191%
Watch Dogs: Legion	350−400 +185%	120−130 −185%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	290−300 +199%	95−100 −199%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	300−310 +191%	100−110 −191%
Battlefield 5	550−600 +191%	180−190 −191%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	300−310 +170%	110−120 −170%
Far Cry 5	300−310 +170%	110−120 −170%
Far Cry New Dawn	400−450 +180%	140−150 −180%
Forza Horizon 4	550−600 +184%	190−200 −184%
Hitman 3	300−310 +163%	110−120 −163%
Horizon Zero Dawn	700−750 +181%	240−250 −181%
Metro Exodus	230−240 +199%	77 −199%
Red Dead Redemption 2	350−400 +194%	110−120 −194%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	800−850 +194%	272 −194%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	800−850 +196%	270 −196%
Watch Dogs: Legion	350−400 +185%	120−130 −185%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	290−300 +199%	95−100 −199%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	300−310 +191%	100−110 −191%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	300−310 +170%	110−120 −170%
Far Cry 5	300−310 +170%	110−120 −170%
Forza Horizon 4	550−600 +184%	190−200 −184%
Horizon Zero Dawn	650−700 +183%	230 −183%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	700−750 +198%	235 −198%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	350−400 +165%	132 −165%
Watch Dogs: Legion	350−400 +185%	120−130 −185%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

350−400
+194%

110−120

−194%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	350−400 +171%	120−130 −171%
Far Cry New Dawn	400−450 +196%	130−140 −196%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	200−210 +194%	65−70 −194%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	210−220 +196%	70−75 −196%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	280−290 +198%	90−95 −198%
Far Cry 5	350−400 +176%	127 −176%
Forza Horizon 4	400−450 +196%	130−140 −196%
Hitman 3	250−260 +198%	80−85 −198%
Horizon Zero Dawn	500−550 +189%	173 −189%
Metro Exodus	350−400 +194%	119 −194%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	450−500 +194%	153 −194%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	280−290 +192%	96 −192%
Watch Dogs: Legion	180−190 +190%	60−65 −190%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

300−310
+197%

100−110

−197%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	200−210 +199%	65−70 −199%
Far Cry New Dawn	160−170 +186%	55−60 −186%
Hitman 3	140−150 +180%	50−55 −180%
Horizon Zero Dawn	250−260 +191%	85−90 −191%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	170−180 +188%	59 −188%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	230−240 +191%	79 −191%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	130−140 +183%	45−50 −183%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	120−130 +179%	40−45 −179%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	120−130 +186%	40−45 −186%
Far Cry 5	110−120 +175%	40−45 −175%
Forza Horizon 4	270−280 +193%	90−95 −193%
Horizon Zero Dawn	280−290 +195%	95 −195%
Metro Exodus	200−210 +199%	67 −199%
Watch Dogs: Legion	100−105 +186%	35−40 −186%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

170−180

+188%

55−60
−188%

This is how RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB and RX 5300 compete in popular games:

RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is 202% faster in 1080p
RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is 207% faster in 1440p
RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is 200% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	59.34	19.79
Recency	18 May 2023	28 May 2020
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	3 GB
Chip lithography	5 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	165 Watt	100 Watt