ATI Radeon X800 vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB and Radeon X800, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
2023
16 GB GDDR6, 165 Watt
59.36
+26882%

RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB outperforms ATI X800 by a whopping 26882% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking341372
Place by popularity92not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation63.91no data
Power efficiency25.090.51
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)R400 (2004−2008)
GPU code nameAD106R430
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date18 May 2023 (1 year ago)1 October 2004 (20 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$499 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4352no data
Core clock speed2310 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed2535 MHzno data
Number of transistors22,900 million160 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm110 nm
Power consumption (TDP)165 Watt30 Watt
Texture fill rate344.84.800
Floating-point processing power22.06 TFLOPSno data
ROPs4812
TMUs13612
Tensor Cores136no data
Ray Tracing Cores34no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 1.0 x16
Length240 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 16-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6DDR
Maximum RAM amount16 GB256 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed2250 MHz350 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/s22.4 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)9.0b (9_2)
Shader Model6.7no data
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL3.0N/A
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA8.9-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB 59.36
+26882%
ATI X800 0.22

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB 22897
+27158%
ATI X800 84

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD1740−1
1440p94-0−1
4K57-0−1

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.87no data
1440p5.31no data
4K8.75no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 120−130 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 100−110 0−1
Battlefield 5 180−190 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 110−120 0−1
Far Cry 5 110−120 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 140−150 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 220−230 0−1
Hitman 3 120−130 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 220−230 0−1
Metro Exodus 150−160 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 230−240 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 140−150 0−1

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 120−130 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 100−110 0−1
Battlefield 5 180−190 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 110−120 0−1
Far Cry 5 110−120 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 140−150 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 220−230 0−1
Hitman 3 120−130 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 220−230 0−1
Metro Exodus 150−160 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 272
+27100%
1−2
−27100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 120−130 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 140−150 0−1

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 120−130 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 100−110 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 110−120 0−1
Far Cry 5 110−120 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 220−230 0−1
Hitman 3 120−130 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 230 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 235 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 132 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 140−150 0−1

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 120−130 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 90−95 0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 65−70 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 70−75 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 70−75 0−1
Far Cry 5 65−70 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 270−280
+27000%
1−2
−27000%
Hitman 3 80−85 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 173 0−1
Metro Exodus 119 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 153 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 96 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 230−240 0−1

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 100−110 0−1

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60 0−1
Hitman 3 50−55 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 220−230 0−1
Metro Exodus 85−90 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 79 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45 0−1
Far Cry 5 40−45 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 90−95 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 80 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 59.36 0.22
Recency 18 May 2023 1 October 2004
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 5 nm 110 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 165 Watt 30 Watt

RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB has a 26881.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 18 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2100% more advanced lithography process.

ATI X800, on the other hand, has 450% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon X800 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
ATI Radeon X800
Radeon X800

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 729 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 38 votes

Rate Radeon X800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.