Apple M1 8-Core GPU vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB with M1 8-Core GPU, including specs and performance data.
RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB outperforms Apple M1 8-Core GPU by a whopping 335% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 47 | 402 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 64.05 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 24.20 | no data |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) | no data |
| GPU code name | AD106 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 18 May 2023 (1 year ago) | 10 November 2020 (4 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 4352 | 8 |
| Core clock speed | 2310 MHz | 1278 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2535 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 22,900 million | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 165 Watt | no data |
| Texture fill rate | 344.8 | no data |
| Floating-point processing power | 22.06 TFLOPS | no data |
| ROPs | 48 | no data |
| TMUs | 136 | no data |
| Tensor Cores | 136 | no data |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 34 | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | no data |
| Length | 240 mm | no data |
| Width | 2-slot | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 16-pin | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR6 | no data |
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | no data |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | no data |
| Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz | no data |
| Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | no data |
| Shared memory | - | + |
| Resizable BAR | + | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | no data |
| HDMI | + | - |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | no data |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | no data |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | no data |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | no data |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | - |
| CUDA | 8.9 | - |
| DLSS | + | - |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
3DMark Ice Storm GPU
Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 171
+511%
| 28
−511%
|
| 1440p | 92
+338%
| 21−24
−338%
|
| 4K | 55
+358%
| 12−14
−358%
|
Cost per frame, $
| 1080p | 2.92 | no data |
| 1440p | 5.42 | no data |
| 4K | 9.07 | no data |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 280−290
+300%
|
70−75
−300%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 176
+577%
|
24−27
−577%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 167
+626%
|
21−24
−626%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 150−160
+184%
|
55−60
−184%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 280−290
+300%
|
70−75
−300%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 137
+427%
|
24−27
−427%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 191
+355%
|
40−45
−355%
|
| Fortnite | 240−250
+230%
|
70−75
−230%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 210−220
+291%
|
50−55
−291%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 160−170
+308%
|
40−45
−308%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 132
+474%
|
21−24
−474%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 170−180
+283%
|
45−50
−283%
|
| Valorant | 300−310
+173%
|
110−120
−173%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 150−160
+184%
|
55−60
−184%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 280−290
+300%
|
70−75
−300%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 270−280
+55.3%
|
170−180
−55.3%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 115
+342%
|
24−27
−342%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 182
+333%
|
40−45
−333%
|
| Fortnite | 240−250
+230%
|
70−75
−230%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 210−220
+291%
|
50−55
−291%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 160−170
+308%
|
40−45
−308%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 163
+240%
|
45−50
−240%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 107
+365%
|
21−24
−365%
|
| Metro Exodus | 130
+400%
|
24−27
−400%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 170−180
+283%
|
45−50
−283%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 270
+718%
|
30−35
−718%
|
| Valorant | 300−310
+173%
|
110−120
−173%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 150−160
+184%
|
55−60
−184%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 103
+296%
|
24−27
−296%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 171
+307%
|
40−45
−307%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 210−220
+291%
|
50−55
−291%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 80
+248%
|
21−24
−248%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 170−180
+283%
|
45−50
−283%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 132
+300%
|
30−35
−300%
|
| Valorant | 300−310
+173%
|
110−120
−173%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 240−250
+230%
|
70−75
−230%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 150−160
+558%
|
24−27
−558%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 350−400
+315%
|
95−100
−315%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 101
+405%
|
20−22
−405%
|
| Metro Exodus | 79
+427%
|
14−16
−427%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 170−180
+57.7%
|
110−120
−57.7%
|
| Valorant | 300−350
+151%
|
130−140
−151%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 130−140
+283%
|
35−40
−283%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 62
+464%
|
10−12
−464%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 127
+354%
|
27−30
−354%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 170−180
+461%
|
30−35
−461%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 58
+314%
|
14−16
−314%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 96
+405%
|
18−20
−405%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 150−160
+439%
|
27−30
−439%
|
4K
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 70−75
+788%
|
8−9
−788%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 101
+321%
|
24−27
−321%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 35−40
+443%
|
7−8
−443%
|
| Metro Exodus | 48
+433%
|
9−10
−433%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 79
+394%
|
16−18
−394%
|
| Valorant | 300−350
+351%
|
65−70
−351%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 90−95
+417%
|
18−20
−417%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 70−75
+788%
|
8−9
−788%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 27
+440%
|
5−6
−440%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 65
+400%
|
12−14
−400%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 120−130
+468%
|
21−24
−468%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 31
+343%
|
7−8
−343%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 95−100
+700%
|
12−14
−700%
|
4K
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 75−80
+558%
|
12−14
−558%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Dota 2 | 80−85
+0%
|
80−85
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Dota 2 | 80−85
+0%
|
80−85
+0%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Dota 2 | 45−50
+0%
|
45−50
+0%
|
This is how RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB and Apple M1 8-Core GPU compete in popular games:
- RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is 511% faster in 1080p
- RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is 338% faster in 1440p
- RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is 358% faster in 4K
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Counter-Strike 2, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is 788% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is ahead in 63 tests (95%)
- there's a draw in 3 tests (5%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 55.59 | 12.79 |
| Recency | 18 May 2023 | 10 November 2020 |
RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB has a 334.6% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 2 years.
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the M1 8-Core GPU in performance tests.
Be aware that GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is a desktop card while Apple M1 8-Core GPU is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
