FirePro A300 vs GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking91not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency25.68no data
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)
GPU code nameGA104Trinity GL
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date12 January 2021 (3 years ago)6 June 2012 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6144384
Core clock speed1110 MHz760 MHz
Boost clock speed1545 MHz905 MHz
Number of transistors17,400 million1,303 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)115 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rate296.621.72
Floating-point processing power18.98 TFLOPS0.695 TFLOPS
ROPs968
TMUs19224
Tensor Cores192no data
Ray Tracing Cores48no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount8 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1750 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model6.55.0
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2N/A
CUDA8.6-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 January 2021 6 June 2012
Chip lithography 8 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 115 Watt 65 Watt

RTX 3080 Mobile has an age advantage of 8 years, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

FirePro A300, on the other hand, has 76.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile and FirePro A300. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile is a notebook card while FirePro A300 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile
GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile
AMD FirePro A300
FirePro A300

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 782 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate FirePro A300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.