Xbox Series S GPU vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking584not rated
Place by popularity93not in top-100
Power efficiency19.69no data
ArchitectureGen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameTiger Lake XeLockhart
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date15 August 2020 (5 years ago)10 November 2020 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$299

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores801280
Core clock speed400 MHz1565 MHz
Boost clock speed1350 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data8,000 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rateno data125.2
Floating-point processing powerno data4.006 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data80
L2 Cacheno data2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataIGP
Lengthno data274 mm
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data8 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data224.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI 2.1
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 August 2020 10 November 2020
Chip lithography 10 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 100 Watt

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs has 257.1% lower power consumption.

Xbox Series S GPU, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 months, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs and Xbox Series S GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is a notebook graphics card while Xbox Series S GPU is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
AMD Xbox Series S GPU
Xbox Series S GPU

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 1096 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 987 votes

Rate Xbox Series S GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs or Xbox Series S GPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.