Arc 8-Cores iGPU vs GeForce RTX 3080 Ti

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 3080 Ti with Arc 8-Cores iGPU, including specs and performance data.

RTX 3080 Ti
2020
12 GB GDDR6X, 350 Watt
70.37
+288%

RTX 3080 Ti outperforms Arc 8-Cores iGPU by a whopping 288% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking16284
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation18.11no data
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2022)Xe LPG
GPU code nameAmpere GA102Meteor Lake iGPU
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date24 September 2020 (3 years ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,199 no data
Current price$1135 (0.9x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores102408
Core clock speed1370 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1667 MHz2300 MHz
Number of transistors28,300 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology8 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)350 Wattno data
Texture fill rate532.8no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce RTX 3080 Ti and Arc 8-Cores iGPU compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16no data
Length285 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 12-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6Xno data
Maximum RAM amount12 GBno data
Memory bus width384 Bitno data
Memory clock speed19000 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth912.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortno data
HDMI+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12_2
Shader Model6.6no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan1.2no data
CUDA8.6no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 3080 Ti 70.37
+288%
Arc 8-Cores iGPU 18.14

GeForce RTX 3080 Ti outperforms Arc 8-Cores iGPU by 288% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RTX 3080 Ti 60980
+397%
Arc 8-Cores iGPU 12276

GeForce RTX 3080 Ti outperforms Arc 8-Cores iGPU by 397% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RTX 3080 Ti 120236
+178%
Arc 8-Cores iGPU 43185

GeForce RTX 3080 Ti outperforms Arc 8-Cores iGPU by 178% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RTX 3080 Ti 47113
+443%
Arc 8-Cores iGPU 8679

GeForce RTX 3080 Ti outperforms Arc 8-Cores iGPU by 443% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RTX 3080 Ti 218185
+414%
Arc 8-Cores iGPU 42473

GeForce RTX 3080 Ti outperforms Arc 8-Cores iGPU by 414% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD213
+433%
40
−433%
1440p145
+806%
16
−806%
4K97
+304%
24−27
−304%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 219
+298%
55−60
−298%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 110−120
+211%
35−40
−211%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 120−130
+300%
30−35
−300%
Battlefield 5 220−230
+281%
55−60
−281%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 110−120
+222%
35−40
−222%
Cyberpunk 2077 184
+309%
45−50
−309%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+216%
37
−216%
Far Cry New Dawn 170−180
+251%
45−50
−251%
Forza Horizon 4 210−220
+161%
80−85
−161%
Hitman 3 120−130
+242%
35−40
−242%
Horizon Zero Dawn 448
+1258%
33
−1258%
Metro Exodus 140−150
+311%
35−40
−311%
Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
+148%
50−55
−148%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 489
+743%
55−60
−743%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
+141%
55−60
−141%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 110−120
+211%
35−40
−211%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 120−130
+300%
30−35
−300%
Battlefield 5 220−230
+281%
55−60
−281%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 110−120
+222%
35−40
−222%
Cyberpunk 2077 160
+300%
40−45
−300%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+234%
35
−234%
Far Cry New Dawn 170−180
+251%
45−50
−251%
Forza Horizon 4 210−220
+161%
80−85
−161%
Hitman 3 120−130
+242%
35−40
−242%
Horizon Zero Dawn 290−300
+1000%
27
−1000%
Metro Exodus 84
+37.7%
60−65
−37.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
+148%
50−55
−148%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 407
+602%
55−60
−602%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 372
+765%
43
−765%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
+141%
55−60
−141%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 110−120
+211%
35−40
−211%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 100
+223%
30−35
−223%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 110−120
+297%
30−33
−297%
Cyberpunk 2077 146
+317%
35−40
−317%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+255%
33
−255%
Forza Horizon 4 210−220
+161%
80−85
−161%
Horizon Zero Dawn 310
+313%
75−80
−313%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 359
+299%
90−95
−299%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 181
+687%
23
−687%
Watch Dogs: Legion 97
+73.2%
55−60
−73.2%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
+313%
30−33
−313%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 160−170
+315%
40−45
−315%
Far Cry New Dawn 140−150
+311%
35−40
−311%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 80−85
+356%
18−20
−356%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 86
+438%
16−18
−438%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−110
+296%
27−30
−296%
Cyberpunk 2077 99
+313%
24−27
−313%
Far Cry 5 176
+487%
30−33
−487%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+386%
35−40
−386%
Hitman 3 100−110
+329%
24−27
−329%
Horizon Zero Dawn 240
+300%
60−65
−300%
Metro Exodus 141
+303%
35−40
−303%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 269
+314%
65−70
−314%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 120−130
+540%
20−22
−540%
Watch Dogs: Legion 89
+642%
12−14
−642%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120
+326%
27−30
−326%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
+319%
21−24
−319%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
+331%
16−18
−331%
Hitman 3 60−65
+343%
14−16
−343%
Horizon Zero Dawn 100−110
+445%
20−22
−445%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 94
+683%
12−14
−683%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 152
+744%
18−20
−744%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 55−60
+480%
10−11
−480%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 61
+578%
9−10
−578%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+333%
12−14
−333%
Cyberpunk 2077 50
+317%
12−14
−317%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+400%
10−11
−400%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+392%
24−27
−392%
Horizon Zero Dawn 145
+314%
35−40
−314%
Metro Exodus 108
+300%
27−30
−300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 59
+743%
7−8
−743%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 75−80
+322%
18−20
−322%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 220−230
+273%
55−60
−273%
Far Cry New Dawn 190−200
+288%
45−50
−288%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85−90
+270%
21−24
−270%
Hitman 3 80−85
+281%
21−24
−281%
Horizon Zero Dawn 140−150
+278%
35−40
−278%
Metro Exodus 120−130
+264%
30−35
−264%
Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120
+267%
30−33
−267%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 130−140
+261%
35−40
−261%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 130−140
+271%
35−40
−271%
Far Cry New Dawn 130−140
+271%
35−40
−271%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−33
+233%
9−10
−233%
Metro Exodus 65−70
+282%
16−18
−282%
Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
+275%
16−18
−275%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
+261%
18−20
−261%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
+257%
14−16
−257%

This is how RTX 3080 Ti and Arc 8-Cores iGPU compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3080 Ti is 433% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3080 Ti is 806% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3080 Ti is 304% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RTX 3080 Ti is 1258% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RTX 3080 Ti surpassed Arc 8-Cores iGPU in all 47 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 70.37 18.14
Recency 24 September 2020 14 December 2023
Chip lithography 8 nm 5 nm

The GeForce RTX 3080 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc 8-Cores iGPU in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 3080 Ti is a desktop card while Arc 8-Cores iGPU is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU
Arc 8-Cores iGPU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 10302 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3080 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 30 votes

Rate Arc 8-Cores iGPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.