Radeon 780M vs GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile and Radeon 780M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RTX 3070 Mobile
2021
8 GB GDDR6, 125 Watt
37.36
+104%

RTX 3070 Mobile outperforms 780M by a whopping 104% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking127304
Place by popularitynot in top-10048
Power efficiency22.4284.13
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGA104Hawx Point
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date12 January 2021 (4 years ago)6 December 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5120768
Core clock speed1110 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speed1560 MHz2700 MHz
Number of transistors17,400 million25,390 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate249.6129.6
Floating-point processing power15.97 TFLOPS8.294 TFLOPS
ROPs8032
TMUs16048
Tensor Cores160no data
Ray Tracing Cores4012

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount8 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1750 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.1
Vulkan1.21.3
CUDA8.6-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 3070 Mobile 37.36
+104%
Radeon 780M 18.29

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 3070 Mobile 14364
+104%
Radeon 780M 7032

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX 3070 Mobile 33996
+166%
Radeon 780M 12785

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RTX 3070 Mobile 77148
+85.4%
Radeon 780M 41622

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX 3070 Mobile 25478
+219%
Radeon 780M 7987

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX 3070 Mobile 136558
+184%
Radeon 780M 48112

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX 3070 Mobile 510435
+18.8%
Radeon 780M 429810

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

RTX 3070 Mobile 9619
+241%
Radeon 780M 2822

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04

RTX 3070 Mobile 199
+197%
Radeon 780M 67

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03

RTX 3070 Mobile 69
Radeon 780M 108
+56.3%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02

RTX 3070 Mobile 11
Radeon 780M 73
+554%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04

RTX 3070 Mobile 108
+39%
Radeon 780M 78

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01

RTX 3070 Mobile 55
+11.5%
Radeon 780M 50

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01

RTX 3070 Mobile 56
Radeon 780M 63
+13.8%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01

RTX 3070 Mobile 136
+367%
Radeon 780M 29

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01

RTX 3070 Mobile 12
Radeon 780M 31
+152%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05

RTX 3070 Mobile 232
+185%
Radeon 780M 81

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD115
+229%
35
−229%
1440p71
+318%
17
−318%
4K46
+229%
14
−229%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 122
+281%
32
−281%
Cyberpunk 2077 119
+205%
39
−205%
Elden Ring 125
+238%
37
−238%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+71.2%
55−60
−71.2%
Counter-Strike 2 102
+292%
26
−292%
Cyberpunk 2077 97
+547%
15
−547%
Forza Horizon 4 224
+245%
65
−245%
Metro Exodus 112
+155%
44
−155%
Red Dead Redemption 2 70−75
+72.1%
40−45
−72.1%
Valorant 140−150
+101%
70−75
−101%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+71.2%
55−60
−71.2%
Counter-Strike 2 85
+240%
25
−240%
Cyberpunk 2077 80
+567%
12
−567%
Dota 2 127
+338%
29
−338%
Elden Ring 181
+331%
42
−331%
Far Cry 5 79
+147%
32
−147%
Fortnite 160−170
+67.7%
95−100
−67.7%
Forza Horizon 4 183
+239%
54
−239%
Grand Theft Auto V 125
+178%
45
−178%
Metro Exodus 91
+184%
32
−184%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 190−200
+55.6%
120−130
−55.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 66
+53.5%
40−45
−53.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 130−140
+130%
55−60
−130%
Valorant 98
+32.4%
70−75
−32.4%
World of Tanks 270−280
+26.8%
220−230
−26.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+71.2%
55−60
−71.2%
Counter-Strike 2 85
+166%
30−35
−166%
Cyberpunk 2077 68
+467%
12
−467%
Dota 2 120
+84.6%
65−70
−84.6%
Far Cry 5 95−100
+50.8%
60−65
−50.8%
Forza Horizon 4 168
+265%
46
−265%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 190−200
+55.6%
120−130
−55.6%
Valorant 183
+147%
70−75
−147%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 83
+361%
18
−361%
Elden Ring 103
+243%
30−33
−243%
Grand Theft Auto V 83
+337%
19
−337%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+5.4%
160−170
−5.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 38
+138%
16−18
−138%
World of Tanks 230−240
+89.6%
120−130
−89.6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+89.2%
35−40
−89.2%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+147%
14−16
−147%
Cyberpunk 2077 43
+207%
14−16
−207%
Far Cry 5 120−130
+150%
45−50
−150%
Forza Horizon 4 125
+291%
32
−291%
Metro Exodus 91
+122%
40−45
−122%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
+220%
20
−220%
Valorant 118
+151%
45−50
−151%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+171%
14−16
−171%
Dota 2 83
+295%
21
−295%
Elden Ring 51
+292%
12−14
−292%
Grand Theft Auto V 83
+295%
21
−295%
Metro Exodus 37
+185%
12−14
−185%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+118%
55−60
−118%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24
+100%
12−14
−100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 83
+295%
21
−295%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+139%
18−20
−139%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+171%
14−16
−171%
Cyberpunk 2077 20
+300%
5−6
−300%
Dota 2 109
+252%
30−35
−252%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+135%
21−24
−135%
Fortnite 50−55
+148%
21−24
−148%
Forza Horizon 4 71
+318%
17
−318%
Valorant 64
+205%
21−24
−205%

This is how RTX 3070 Mobile and Radeon 780M compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3070 Mobile is 229% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3070 Mobile is 318% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3070 Mobile is 229% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 3070 Mobile is 567% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RTX 3070 Mobile surpassed Radeon 780M in all 63 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 37.36 18.29
Recency 12 January 2021 6 December 2023
Chip lithography 8 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 15 Watt

RTX 3070 Mobile has a 104.3% higher aggregate performance score.

Radeon 780M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 733.3% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 780M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile
GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile
AMD Radeon 780M
Radeon 780M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 1939 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 1625 votes

Rate Radeon 780M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.