RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile vs GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

Place in the ranking	32	95
Place by popularity	88	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	52.68	no data
Power efficiency	14.55	25.02
Architecture	Ampere (2020−2024)	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code name	GA104	no data
Market segment	Desktop	Mobile workstation
Release date	31 May 2021 (3 years ago)	21 March 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$599	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	6144	4608
Core clock speed	1575 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1770 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	17,400 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	8 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	290 Watt	115 Watt (35 - 115 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate	339.8	no data
Floating-point processing power	21.75 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	96	no data
TMUs	192	no data
Tensor Cores	192	no data
Ray Tracing Cores	48	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	no data
Length	267 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 12-pin	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6X	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1188 MHz	16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	608.3 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	no data
HDMI	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate
Shader Model	6.6	no data
OpenGL	4.6	no data
OpenCL	3.0	no data
Vulkan	1.2	-
CUDA	8.6	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 3070 Ti 61.14
+46.6%

RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile 41.71

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 3070 Ti 23509
+46.6%

RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile 16037

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX 3070 Ti 49760
+69.2%

RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile 29411

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX 3070 Ti 37663
+80.1%

RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile 20908

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX 3070 Ti 208428
+152%

RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile 82612

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	176 +46.7%	120−130 −46.7%
1440p	94 +56.7%	60−65 −56.7%
4K	62 +55%	40−45 −55%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	3.40	no data
1440p	6.37	no data
4K	9.66	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	193 +48.5%	130−140 −48.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	174 +58.2%	110−120 −58.2%
Elden Ring	195 +50%	130−140 −50%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +56%	75−80 −56%
Counter-Strike 2	152 +52%	100−105 −52%
Cyberpunk 2077	69 +53.3%	45−50 −53.3%
Forza Horizon 4	398 +47.4%	270−280 −47.4%
Metro Exodus	173 +57.3%	110−120 −57.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	110−120 +48%	75−80 −48%
Valorant	270−280 +46.8%	190−200 −46.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +56%	75−80 −56%
Counter-Strike 2	131 +54.1%	85−90 −54.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	61 +52.5%	40−45 −52.5%
Dota 2	198 +52.3%	130−140 −52.3%
Elden Ring	230−240 +54%	150−160 −54%
Far Cry 5	162 +47.3%	110−120 −47.3%
Fortnite	240−250 +50%	160−170 −50%
Forza Horizon 4	316 +50.5%	210−220 −50.5%
Grand Theft Auto V	173 +57.3%	110−120 −57.3%
Metro Exodus	138 +53.3%	90−95 −53.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	210−220 +53.6%	140−150 −53.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2	110−120 +48%	75−80 −48%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	170−180 +58.2%	110−120 −58.2%
Valorant	270−280 +46.8%	190−200 −46.8%
World of Tanks	270−280 +46.8%	190−200 −46.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +56%	75−80 −56%
Counter-Strike 2	114 +52%	75−80 −52%
Cyberpunk 2077	56 +60%	35−40 −60%
Dota 2	230 +53.3%	150−160 −53.3%
Far Cry 5	120−130 +50%	80−85 −50%
Forza Horizon 4	274 +52.2%	180−190 −52.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	210−220 +53.6%	140−150 −53.6%
Valorant	270−280 +46.8%	190−200 −46.8%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	137 +52.2%	90−95 −52.2%
Elden Ring	150−160 +51%	100−105 −51%
Grand Theft Auto V	137 +52.2%	90−95 −52.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +59.1%	110−120 −59.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2	70−75 +60%	45−50 −60%
World of Tanks	400−450 +50.4%	270−280 −50.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	85−90 +58.2%	55−60 −58.2%
Counter-Strike 2	71 +57.8%	45−50 −57.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	36 +50%	24−27 −50%
Far Cry 5	160−170 +60%	100−105 −60%
Forza Horizon 4	205 +57.7%	130−140 −57.7%
Metro Exodus	135 +50%	90−95 −50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	120−130 +50.6%	85−90 −50.6%
Valorant	240−250 +51.9%	160−170 −51.9%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	47 +56.7%	30−33 −56.7%
Dota 2	147 +47%	100−105 −47%
Elden Ring	75−80 +56%	50−55 −56%
Grand Theft Auto V	147 +47%	100−105 −47%
Metro Exodus	56 +60%	35−40 −60%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	200−210 +49.3%	140−150 −49.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	45−50 +60%	30−33 −60%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	147 +47%	100−105 −47%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	75−80 +56%	50−55 −56%
Counter-Strike 2	70−75 +60%	45−50 −60%
Cyberpunk 2077	18 +50%	12−14 −50%
Dota 2	194 +49.2%	130−140 −49.2%
Far Cry 5	100−110 +50%	70−75 −50%
Fortnite	95−100 +47.7%	65−70 −47.7%
Forza Horizon 4	119 +48.8%	80−85 −48.8%
Valorant	130−140 +52.2%	90−95 −52.2%

This is how RTX 3070 Ti and RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile compete in popular games:

RTX 3070 Ti is 47% faster in 1080p
RTX 3070 Ti is 57% faster in 1440p
RTX 3070 Ti is 55% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	61.14	41.71
Recency	31 May 2021	21 March 2023
Chip lithography	8 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	290 Watt	115 Watt

RTX 3070 Ti has a 46.6% higher aggregate performance score.

RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 60% more advanced lithography process, and 152.2% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 3070 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 3070 Ti is a desktop card while RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.