Radeon PRO W7700 vs GeForce RTX 3060

Place in performance ranking	71	45
Place by popularity	5	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	42.69	23.99
Architecture	Ampere (2020−2022)	RDNA 3.0 (2022)
GPU code name	Ampere GA106	Navi 32
Market segment	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	12 January 2021 (3 years ago)	13 November 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$329	$999
Current price	$317 (1x MSRP)	$999 (1x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 3060 has 78% better value for money than PRO W7700.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	3584	3072
Core clock speed	1320 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1777 MHz	2600 MHz
Number of transistors	13,250 million	28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology	8 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	170 Watt	190 Watt
Texture fill rate	199.0	499.2

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	242 mm	241 mm
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 12-pin	1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	192 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	15000 MHz	18 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	360.0 GB/s	576.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	4x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.5	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	2.2
Vulkan	1.2	1.3
CUDA	8.6	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 3060 44.19

PRO W7700 52.41
+18.6%

Radeon PRO W7700 outperforms GeForce RTX 3060 by 19% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RTX 3060 17085

PRO W7700 20263
+18.6%

Radeon PRO W7700 outperforms GeForce RTX 3060 by 19% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	117 −11.1%	130−140 +11.1%
1440p	78 −15.4%	90−95 +15.4%
4K	54 −11.1%	60−65 +11.1%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

−13.9%

90−95
+13.9%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	75−80 −13.3%	85−90 +13.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	102 −17.6%	120−130 +17.6%
Battlefield 5	140−150 −12.7%	160−170 +12.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	95−100 −13.4%	110−120 +13.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	78 −15.4%	90−95 +15.4%
Far Cry 5	85−90 −16.3%	100−105 +16.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	100−110 −12.1%	120−130 +12.1%
Forza Horizon 4	130−140 −13.6%	150−160 +13.6%
Hitman 3	110−120 −18.2%	130−140 +18.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn	259 −15.8%	300−310 +15.8%
Metro Exodus	100−110 −11.1%	120−130 +11.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2	100−110 −17.6%	120−130 +17.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	226 −15%	260−270 +15%
Watch Dogs: Legion	108 −11.1%	120−130 +11.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	75−80 −13.3%	85−90 +13.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	85 −17.6%	100−105 +17.6%
Battlefield 5	140−150 −12.7%	160−170 +12.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	95−100 −13.4%	110−120 +13.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	75 −13.3%	85−90 +13.3%
Far Cry 5	105 −14.3%	120−130 +14.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	58 −12.1%	65−70 +12.1%
Forza Horizon 4	130−140 −13.6%	150−160 +13.6%
Hitman 3	104 −15.4%	120−130 +15.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	208 −15.4%	240−250 +15.4%
Metro Exodus	115 −13%	130−140 +13%
Red Dead Redemption 2	100−110 −17.6%	120−130 +17.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	148 −14.9%	170−180 +14.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	171 −17%	200−210 +17%
Watch Dogs: Legion	95 −15.8%	110−120 +15.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	75−80 −13.3%	85−90 +13.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	75 −13.3%	85−90 +13.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	95−100 −13.4%	110−120 +13.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	64 −17.2%	75−80 +17.2%
Far Cry 5	85−90 −16.3%	100−105 +16.3%
Forza Horizon 4	130−140 −13.6%	150−160 +13.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn	142 −12.7%	160−170 +12.7%
Metro Exodus	102 −17.6%	120−130 +17.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	73 −16.4%	85−90 +16.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion	59 −10.2%	65−70 +10.2%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

100−110

−17.6%

120−130
+17.6%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	85−90 −14.9%	100−105 +14.9%
Far Cry New Dawn	100−110 −15.4%	120−130 +15.4%
Hitman 3	71 −12.7%	80−85 +12.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	35−40 −11.1%	40−45 +11.1%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	45−50 −14.6%	55−60 +14.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	60 −16.7%	70−75 +16.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	65−70 −15.9%	80−85 +15.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	39 −15.4%	45−50 +15.4%
Far Cry 5	94 −17%	110−120 +17%
Forza Horizon 4	90−95 −17%	110−120 +17%
Horizon Zero Dawn	106 −13.2%	120−130 +13.2%
Metro Exodus	89 −12.4%	100−105 +12.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	115 −13%	130−140 +13%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	65−70 −13.6%	75−80 +13.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45 −11.1%	50−55 +11.1%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5	89 −12.4%	100−105 +12.4%
Far Cry New Dawn	55−60 −10.2%	65−70 +10.2%
Hitman 3	45 −11.1%	50−55 +11.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn	55−60 −12.1%	65−70 +12.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	43 −16.3%	50−55 +16.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	63 −11.1%	70−75 +11.1%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−35 −12.9%	35−40 +12.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	38 −18.4%	45−50 +18.4%
Battlefield 5	50−55 −11.1%	60−65 +11.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	40−45 −13.6%	50−55 +13.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	18 −16.7%	21−24 +16.7%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 −11.1%	70−75 +11.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn	60 −16.7%	70−75 +16.7%
Metro Exodus	50 −10%	55−60 +10%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27 −11.1%	30−33 +11.1%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

40−45

−12.5%

45−50
+12.5%

This is how RTX 3060 and PRO W7700 compete in popular games:

PRO W7700 is 11% faster in 1080p
PRO W7700 is 15% faster in 1440p
PRO W7700 is 11% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	44.19	52.41
Recency	12 January 2021	13 November 2023
Cost	$329	$999
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	16 GB
Chip lithography	8 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	170 Watt	190 Watt