Radeon PRO W7700 vs RX 6900 XT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 6900 XT with Radeon PRO W7700, including specs and performance data.

RX 6900 XT
2020
16 GB GDDR6, 300 Watt
69.50
+34.1%

RX 6900 XT outperforms PRO W7700 by a substantial 34% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking1845
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation21.6824.85
ArchitectureNavi / RDNA2 (2020−2022)RDNA 3.0 (2022)
GPU code nameNavi 21Navi 32
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date8 December 2020 (3 years ago)13 November 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$999 $999
Current price$957 (1x MSRP)$999 (1x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

PRO W7700 has 15% better value for money than RX 6900 XT.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51203072
Core clock speed1825 MHzno data
Boost clock speed2250 MHz2600 MHz
Number of transistors26,800 million28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt190 Watt
Texture fill rate720.0499.2

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mm241 mm
Width3-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pin1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed16000 MHz18 GB/s
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/s576.0 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C4x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.12.2
Vulkan1.21.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 6900 XT 69.50
+34.1%
PRO W7700 51.83

RX 6900 XT outperforms PRO W7700 by 34% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RX 6900 XT 26837
+34.1%
PRO W7700 20016

RX 6900 XT outperforms PRO W7700 by 34% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD202
+34.7%
150−160
−34.7%
1440p137
+37%
100−110
−37%
4K86
+43.3%
60−65
−43.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 180−190
+33.3%
130−140
−33.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 150−160
+28.2%
117
−28.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 220−230
+30.2%
169
−30.2%
Battlefield 5 290−300
+30.6%
220−230
−30.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 150−160
+26.1%
110−120
−26.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 180−190
+33.3%
130−140
−33.3%
Far Cry 5 150−160
+28.2%
110−120
−28.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 220−230
+29.4%
170−180
−29.4%
Forza Horizon 4 350−400
+23.7%
283
−23.7%
Hitman 3 160−170
+31.1%
120−130
−31.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 550−600
+24.4%
442
−24.4%
Metro Exodus 190−200
+32.9%
140−150
−32.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 160−170
+29%
120−130
−29%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 400−450
+24.2%
300−350
−24.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 250−260
+31.6%
190
−31.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 140−150
+32.1%
106
−32.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 190−200
+33.8%
142
−33.8%
Battlefield 5 290−300
+30.6%
220−230
−30.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 150−160
+26.1%
110−120
−26.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 180−190
+33.3%
130−140
−33.3%
Far Cry 5 150−160
+28.2%
110−120
−28.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 220−230
+29.4%
170−180
−29.4%
Forza Horizon 4 290−300
+33.6%
210−220
−33.6%
Hitman 3 80−85
+31.1%
61
−31.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 350−400
+19%
290−300
−19%
Metro Exodus 80−85
+29%
62
−29%
Red Dead Redemption 2 160−170
+29%
120−130
−29%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 400−450
+24.2%
300−350
−24.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 400−450
+23.8%
323
−23.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 170−180
+26.9%
130−140
−26.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 130−140
+32.7%
98
−32.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 180−190
+31.4%
137
−31.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 150−160
+26.1%
110−120
−26.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 180−190
+33.3%
130−140
−33.3%
Far Cry 5 150−160
+28.2%
110−120
−28.2%
Forza Horizon 4 300−310
+21%
248
−21%
Horizon Zero Dawn 350−400
+23.7%
283
−23.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 400−450
+24.2%
300−350
−24.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 210−220
+28%
164
−28%
Watch Dogs: Legion 160−170
+32.2%
121
−32.2%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 160−170
+29%
120−130
−29%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 220−230
+32.5%
160−170
−32.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 190−200
+31.9%
140−150
−31.9%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 130−140
+31.3%
99
−31.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 140−150
+28.4%
109
−28.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 140−150
+32.1%
100−110
−32.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 95−100
+28.4%
70−75
−28.4%
Far Cry 5 170−180
+27.8%
130−140
−27.8%
Forza Horizon 4 300−310
+29.9%
231
−29.9%
Hitman 3 130−140
+28.7%
100−110
−28.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 300−310
+33.9%
224
−33.9%
Metro Exodus 150−160
+28.2%
117
−28.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 260−270
+32%
190−200
−32%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 160−170
+27%
120−130
−27%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130
+31.9%
91
−31.9%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 150−160
+31.6%
110−120
−31.6%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+26.4%
85−90
−26.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 90−95
+30.4%
65−70
−30.4%
Hitman 3 110−120
+32.5%
83
−32.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 140−150
+30.8%
100−110
−30.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 110−120
+29.4%
85
−29.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 160−170
+31.1%
122
−31.1%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 90−95
+32.4%
68
−32.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 85−90
+28.8%
66
−28.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65−70
+27.5%
50−55
−27.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+28.6%
35−40
−28.6%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+30%
50−55
−30%
Forza Horizon 4 210−220
+29.6%
162
−29.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 180−190
+31.4%
137
−31.4%
Metro Exodus 130−140
+28.7%
101
−28.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 70−75
+29.6%
54
−29.6%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 100−105
+33.3%
75−80
−33.3%

This is how RX 6900 XT and PRO W7700 compete in popular games:

  • RX 6900 XT is 35% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6900 XT is 37% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6900 XT is 43% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 69.50 51.83
Recency 8 December 2020 13 November 2023
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 190 Watt

The Radeon RX 6900 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon PRO W7700 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 6900 XT is a desktop card while Radeon PRO W7700 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
Radeon RX 6900 XT
AMD Radeon PRO W7700
Radeon PRO W7700

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 3487 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6900 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 3 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W7700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.