Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS vs GeForce RTX 3060

Place in the ranking	81	413
Place by popularity	4	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	71.31	no data
Power efficiency	18.16	20.04
Architecture	Ampere (2020−2024)	no data
GPU code name	GA106	no data
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	12 January 2021 (3 years ago)	no data (2024 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$329	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	3584	1536
Core clock speed	1320 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1777 MHz	1500 MHz
Number of transistors	12,000 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	8 nm	4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	170 Watt	40 Watt
Texture fill rate	199.0	no data
Floating-point processing power	12.74 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	48	no data
TMUs	112	no data
Tensor Cores	112	no data
Ray Tracing Cores	28	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	no data
Length	242 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 12-pin	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	LPDDR5x
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	no data
Memory bus width	192 Bit	no data
Memory clock speed	1875 MHz	8448 MHz
Memory bandwidth	360.0 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a	no data
HDMI	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12_1
Shader Model	6.7	no data
OpenGL	4.6	no data
OpenCL	3.0	no data
Vulkan	1.3	-
CUDA	8.6	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 3060 44.29
+285%

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS 11.50

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX 3060 28375
+302%

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS 7061

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RTX 3060 79706
+231%

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS 24058

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX 3060 21379
+206%

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS 6982

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	124 +210%	40 −210%
1440p	81 +286%	21−24 −286%
4K	52 +333%	12−14 −333%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	2.65	no data
1440p	4.06	no data
4K	6.33	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

79
+339%

18−20

−339%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	90−95 +288%	24−27 −288%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	102 +325%	24−27 −325%
Battlefield 5	140−150 +306%	35−40 −306%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	85−90 +324%	21−24 −324%
Cyberpunk 2077	78 +333%	18−20 −333%
Far Cry 5	90−95 +288%	24−27 −288%
Far Cry New Dawn	100−110 +300%	27−30 −300%
Forza Horizon 4	200−210 +306%	50−55 −306%
Hitman 3	120 +300%	30−33 −300%
Horizon Zero Dawn	170−180 +298%	45−50 −298%
Metro Exodus	130−140 +289%	35−40 −289%
Red Dead Redemption 2	95−100 +313%	24−27 −313%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	160−170 +315%	40−45 −315%
Watch Dogs: Legion	130−140 +286%	35−40 −286%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	90−95 +288%	24−27 −288%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	85 +305%	21−24 −305%
Battlefield 5	140−150 +306%	35−40 −306%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	85−90 +324%	21−24 −324%
Cyberpunk 2077	75 +317%	18−20 −317%
Far Cry 5	90−95 +288%	24−27 −288%
Far Cry New Dawn	100−110 +300%	27−30 −300%
Forza Horizon 4	200−210 +306%	50−55 −306%
Hitman 3	116 +287%	30−33 −287%
Horizon Zero Dawn	170−180 +298%	45−50 −298%
Metro Exodus	130−140 +289%	35−40 −289%
Red Dead Redemption 2	95−100 +313%	24−27 −313%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	180 +300%	45−50 −300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	90−95 +333%	21−24 −333%
Watch Dogs: Legion	130−140 +286%	35−40 −286%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	90−95 +288%	24−27 −288%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	75 +317%	18−20 −317%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	85−90 +324%	21−24 −324%
Cyberpunk 2077	64 +300%	16−18 −300%
Far Cry 5	90−95 +288%	24−27 −288%
Forza Horizon 4	200−210 +306%	50−55 −306%
Hitman 3	101 +321%	24−27 −321%
Horizon Zero Dawn	142 +306%	35−40 −306%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	154 +340%	35−40 −340%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	73 +306%	18−20 −306%
Watch Dogs: Legion	59 +321%	14−16 −321%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

95−100
+313%

24−27

−313%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	85−90 +314%	21−24 −314%
Far Cry New Dawn	65−70 +325%	16−18 −325%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	45−50 +308%	12−14 −308%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	60 +329%	14−16 −329%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55 +333%	12−14 −333%
Cyberpunk 2077	39 +290%	10−11 −290%
Far Cry 5	50−55 +325%	12−14 −325%
Forza Horizon 4	240−250 +302%	60−65 −302%
Hitman 3	68 +325%	16−18 −325%
Horizon Zero Dawn	106 +293%	27−30 −293%
Metro Exodus	89 +324%	21−24 −324%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	115 +326%	27−30 −326%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	65−70 +319%	16−18 −319%
Watch Dogs: Legion	200−210 +310%	50−55 −310%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

75−80
+322%

18−20

−322%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	45−50 +350%	10−11 −350%
Far Cry New Dawn	35−40 +322%	9−10 −322%
Hitman 3	45 +350%	10−11 −350%
Horizon Zero Dawn	190−200 +290%	50−55 −290%
Metro Exodus	55−60 +321%	14−16 −321%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	63 +294%	16−18 −294%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−35 +288%	8−9 −288%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	38 +322%	9−10 −322%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 +314%	7−8 −314%
Cyberpunk 2077	18 +350%	4−5 −350%
Far Cry 5	27−30 +286%	7−8 −286%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 +294%	16−18 −294%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	67 +319%	16−18 −319%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27 +286%	7−8 −286%