Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS vs GeForce RTX 3060

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 3060 with Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS, including specs and performance data.

RTX 3060
2021
12 GB GDDR6, 170 Watt
44.29
+285%

RTX 3060 outperforms Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS by a whopping 285% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking81415
Place by popularity4not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation72.22no data
Power efficiency18.90no data
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)no data
GPU code nameGA106no data
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date12 January 2021 (3 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$329 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores35841536
Core clock speed1320 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1777 MHz1500 MHz
Number of transistors12,000 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology8 nmno data
Power consumption (TDP)170 Wattno data
Texture fill rate199.0no data
Floating-point processing power12.74 TFLOPSno data
ROPs48no data
TMUs112no data
Tensor Cores112no data
Ray Tracing Cores28no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16no data
Length242 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 12-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6LPDDR5x
Maximum RAM amount12 GBno data
Memory bus width192 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1875 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth360.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4ano data
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12_1
Shader Model6.7no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan1.3-
CUDA8.6-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 3060 44.29
+285%
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS 11.49

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RTX 3060 79706
+231%
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS 24058

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX 3060 28375
+302%
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS 7061

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX 3060 21379
+206%
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS 6982

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD124
+210%
40
−210%
1440p81
+286%
21−24
−286%
4K51
+325%
12−14
−325%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 79
+339%
18−20
−339%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 90−95
+288%
24−27
−288%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 102
+325%
24−27
−325%
Battlefield 5 140−150
+306%
35−40
−306%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85−90
+324%
21−24
−324%
Cyberpunk 2077 78
+333%
18−20
−333%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+288%
24−27
−288%
Far Cry New Dawn 100−110
+300%
27−30
−300%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210
+306%
50−55
−306%
Hitman 3 120
+300%
30−33
−300%
Horizon Zero Dawn 170−180
+298%
45−50
−298%
Metro Exodus 130−140
+289%
35−40
−289%
Red Dead Redemption 2 95−100
+313%
24−27
−313%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 160−170
+315%
40−45
−315%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
+286%
35−40
−286%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 90−95
+288%
24−27
−288%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 85
+305%
21−24
−305%
Battlefield 5 140−150
+306%
35−40
−306%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85−90
+324%
21−24
−324%
Cyberpunk 2077 75
+317%
18−20
−317%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+288%
24−27
−288%
Far Cry New Dawn 100−110
+300%
27−30
−300%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210
+306%
50−55
−306%
Hitman 3 116
+287%
30−33
−287%
Horizon Zero Dawn 170−180
+298%
45−50
−298%
Metro Exodus 130−140
+289%
35−40
−289%
Red Dead Redemption 2 95−100
+313%
24−27
−313%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 180
+300%
45−50
−300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 90−95
+333%
21−24
−333%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
+286%
35−40
−286%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 90−95
+288%
24−27
−288%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 75
+317%
18−20
−317%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85−90
+324%
21−24
−324%
Cyberpunk 2077 64
+300%
16−18
−300%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+288%
24−27
−288%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210
+306%
50−55
−306%
Hitman 3 101
+321%
24−27
−321%
Horizon Zero Dawn 142
+306%
35−40
−306%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 154
+340%
35−40
−340%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 73
+306%
18−20
−306%
Watch Dogs: Legion 59
+321%
14−16
−321%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 95−100
+313%
24−27
−313%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
+314%
21−24
−314%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
+325%
16−18
−325%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
+308%
12−14
−308%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60
+329%
14−16
−329%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+333%
12−14
−333%
Cyberpunk 2077 39
+290%
10−11
−290%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+325%
12−14
−325%
Forza Horizon 4 240−250
+302%
60−65
−302%
Hitman 3 68
+325%
16−18
−325%
Horizon Zero Dawn 106
+293%
27−30
−293%
Metro Exodus 89
+324%
21−24
−324%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 115
+326%
27−30
−326%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
+319%
16−18
−319%
Watch Dogs: Legion 200−210
+310%
50−55
−310%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 75−80
+322%
18−20
−322%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+350%
10−11
−350%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+322%
9−10
−322%
Hitman 3 45
+350%
10−11
−350%
Horizon Zero Dawn 190−200
+290%
50−55
−290%
Metro Exodus 55−60
+321%
14−16
−321%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 63
+294%
16−18
−294%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
+288%
8−9
−288%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 38
+322%
9−10
−322%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+314%
7−8
−314%
Cyberpunk 2077 18
+350%
4−5
−350%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+286%
7−8
−286%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+294%
16−18
−294%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 67
+319%
16−18
−319%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27
+286%
7−8
−286%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+300%
10−11
−300%

This is how RTX 3060 and Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3060 is 210% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3060 is 286% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3060 is 325% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 44.29 11.49

RTX 3060 has a 285.5% higher aggregate performance score.

The GeForce RTX 3060 is our recommended choice as it beats the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 3060 is a desktop card while Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
GeForce RTX 3060
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 27406 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3060 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.