GeForce RTX 3060 GDDR6X vs Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking410not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency19.88no data
Architectureno dataAmpere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameno dataGA104
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores15363584
Boost clock speed1500 MHz1777 MHz
Number of transistorsno data17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt195 Watt
Texture fill rateno data199.0
ROPsno data48
TMUsno data112

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data242 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 12-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR5xGDDR6X
Maximum RAM amountno data8 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speed8448 MHz19 GB/s
Memory bandwidthno data304.1 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-8.6

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 4 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 195 Watt

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS has a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 387.5% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS and GeForce RTX 3060 GDDR6X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 3060 GDDR6X is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 GDDR6X
GeForce RTX 3060 GDDR6X

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 82 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3060 GDDR6X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.