Quadro RTX A6000 vs GeForce RTX 3060

Place in the ranking	82	38
Place by popularity	4	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	70.36	10.87
Power efficiency	18.03	13.48
Architecture	Ampere (2020−2024)	Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code name	GA106	GA102
Market segment	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	12 January 2021 (4 years ago)	5 October 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$329	$4,649

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 3060 has 547% better value for money than RTX A6000.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	3584	10752
Core clock speed	1320 MHz	1410 MHz
Boost clock speed	1777 MHz	1800 MHz
Number of transistors	12,000 million	28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	8 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	170 Watt	300 Watt
Texture fill rate	199.0	604.8
Floating-point processing power	12.74 TFLOPS	38.71 TFLOPS
ROPs	48	112
TMUs	112	336
Tensor Cores	112	336
Ray Tracing Cores	28	84

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	242 mm	267 mm
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 12-pin	8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	48 GB
Memory bus width	192 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	1875 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	360.0 GB/s	768.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a	4x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.7	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
CUDA	8.6	8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 3060 44.43

RTX A6000 58.61
+31.9%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 3060 17085

RTX A6000 22535
+31.9%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX 3060 28375

RTX A6000 50957
+79.6%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RTX 3060 79706

RTX A6000 89510
+12.3%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX 3060 21379

RTX A6000 27511
+28.7%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX 3060 120745
+6.7%

RTX A6000 113167

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX 3060 537787
+8.7%

RTX A6000 494750

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	122 −43.4%	175 +43.4%
1440p	72 −79.2%	129 +79.2%
4K	50 −128%	114 +128%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	2.70 +885%	26.57 −885%
1440p	4.57 +689%	36.04 −689%
4K	6.58 +520%	40.78 −520%

RTX 3060 has 885% lower cost per frame in 1080p
RTX 3060 has 689% lower cost per frame in 1440p
RTX 3060 has 520% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	95−100 −40.6%	130−140 +40.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	79 −67.1%	130−140 +67.1%
Elden Ring	119 −84%	210−220 +84%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 −5.4%	110−120 +5.4%
Counter-Strike 2	95−100 −40.6%	130−140 +40.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	77 −71.4%	130−140 +71.4%
Forza Horizon 4	226 −32.7%	300 +32.7%
Metro Exodus	120 +81.8%	66 −81.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2	85−90 −25.9%	100−110 +25.9%
Valorant	180−190 −44.2%	260−270 +44.2%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 −5.4%	110−120 +5.4%
Counter-Strike 2	95−100 −40.6%	130−140 +40.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	72 −83.3%	130−140 +83.3%
Dota 2	146 +10.6%	132 −10.6%
Elden Ring	149 −47%	210−220 +47%
Far Cry 5	105 +34.6%	78 −34.6%
Fortnite	180−190 −23.5%	230−240 +23.5%
Forza Horizon 4	180 −62.8%	293 +62.8%
Grand Theft Auto V	141 +10.2%	128 −10.2%
Metro Exodus	87 +11.5%	78 −11.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	200−210 −2.9%	210−220 +2.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	85−90 −25.9%	100−110 +25.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	160−170 −7.4%	170−180 +7.4%
Valorant	180−190 −44.2%	260−270 +44.2%
World of Tanks	270−280 +0%	270−280 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 −5.4%	110−120 +5.4%
Counter-Strike 2	95−100 −40.6%	130−140 +40.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	60 −120%	130−140 +120%
Dota 2	147 +12.2%	131 −12.2%
Far Cry 5	100−110 −13.6%	110−120 +13.6%
Forza Horizon 4	154 −87%	288 +87%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	200−210 −2.9%	210−220 +2.9%
Valorant	180−190 −44.2%	260−270 +44.2%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	81 −18.5%	96 +18.5%
Elden Ring	85 −65.9%	140−150 +65.9%
Grand Theft Auto V	81 −18.5%	96 +18.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +0%	170−180 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	45−50 −47.8%	65−70 +47.8%
World of Tanks	280−290 −37%	350−400 +37%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	75−80 −11.5%	85−90 +11.5%
Counter-Strike 2	45−50 −53.2%	70−75 +53.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	37 −94.6%	70−75 +94.6%
Far Cry 5	140−150 −11.9%	160−170 +11.9%
Forza Horizon 4	115 −115%	247 +115%
Metro Exodus	89 +41.3%	63 −41.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	80−85 −49.4%	120−130 +49.4%
Valorant	140−150 −53.4%	220−230 +53.4%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	45−50 −41.7%	65−70 +41.7%
Dota 2	82 −89%	155 +89%
Elden Ring	44 −63.6%	70−75 +63.6%
Grand Theft Auto V	82 −89%	155 +89%
Metro Exodus	32 −119%	70 +119%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	140−150 −41.5%	200−210 +41.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−33 −46.7%	40−45 +46.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	82 −89%	155 +89%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	50−55 −39.6%	70−75 +39.6%
Counter-Strike 2	45−50 −41.7%	65−70 +41.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	17 −100%	30−35 +100%
Dota 2	115 −11.3%	128 +11.3%
Far Cry 5	65−70 −52.2%	100−110 +52.2%
Fortnite	65−70 −45.5%	95−100 +45.5%
Forza Horizon 4	67 −122%	149 +122%
Valorant	75−80 −60.8%	120−130 +60.8%

This is how RTX 3060 and RTX A6000 compete in popular games:

RTX A6000 is 43% faster in 1080p
RTX A6000 is 79% faster in 1440p
RTX A6000 is 128% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RTX 3060 is 82% faster.
in Forza Horizon 4, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX A6000 is 122% faster.

All in all, in popular games: