Arc Pro B50 vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile with Arc Pro B50, including specs and performance data.

RTX 3050 6GB Mobile
2023
6 GB GDDR6, 60 Watt
21.71

Pro B50 outperforms 3050 6GB Mobile by a substantial 37% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking268194
Place by popularity87not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data47.45
Power efficiency29.1534.32
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2025)Xe2 (2024)
GPU code nameGN20-P0-R 6 GBBMG-G21
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date6 January 2023 (2 years ago)5 September 2025 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$349

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25602048
Core clock speed1237 MHz1700 MHz
Boost clock speed1492 MHz2600 MHz
Number of transistorsno data19,600 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)60 Watt (35 - 80 Watt TGP)70 Watt
Texture fill rateno data332.8
Floating-point processing powerno data10.65 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data128
Ray Tracing Coresno data16
L2 Cacheno data4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 5.0 x8
Lengthno data167 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount6 GB16 GB
Memory bus width96 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed12000 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data224.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.4

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD70
−35.7%
95−100
+35.7%
1440p34
−32.4%
45−50
+32.4%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.67
1440pno data7.76

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 130−140
−35.3%
180−190
+35.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 81
−35.8%
110−120
+35.8%
Hogwarts Legacy 45−50
−27.7%
60−65
+27.7%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 90−95
−29%
120−130
+29%
Counter-Strike 2 130−140
−35.3%
180−190
+35.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 64
−32.8%
85−90
+32.8%
Far Cry 5 85
−29.4%
110−120
+29.4%
Fortnite 110−120
−29.3%
150−160
+29.3%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
−29%
120−130
+29%
Forza Horizon 5 70−75
−35.1%
100−105
+35.1%
Hogwarts Legacy 45−50
−27.7%
60−65
+27.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95
−31.9%
120−130
+31.9%
Valorant 160−170
−35%
220−230
+35%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 90−95
−29%
120−130
+29%
Counter-Strike 2 130−140
−35.3%
180−190
+35.3%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 250−260
−18.1%
300−310
+18.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 46
−30.4%
60−65
+30.4%
Dota 2 120−130
−32.2%
160−170
+32.2%
Far Cry 5 78
−28.2%
100−105
+28.2%
Fortnite 110−120
−29.3%
150−160
+29.3%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
−29%
120−130
+29%
Forza Horizon 5 70−75
−35.1%
100−105
+35.1%
Grand Theft Auto V 92
−30.4%
120−130
+30.4%
Hogwarts Legacy 45−50
−27.7%
60−65
+27.7%
Metro Exodus 50−55
−37.3%
70−75
+37.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95
−31.9%
120−130
+31.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 91
−31.9%
120−130
+31.9%
Valorant 160−170
−35%
220−230
+35%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 90−95
−29%
120−130
+29%
Cyberpunk 2077 39
−28.2%
50−55
+28.2%
Dota 2 120−130
−32.2%
160−170
+32.2%
Far Cry 5 74
−35.1%
100−105
+35.1%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
−29%
120−130
+29%
Hogwarts Legacy 45−50
−27.7%
60−65
+27.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95
−31.9%
120−130
+31.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50
−30%
65−70
+30%
Valorant 160−170
−35%
220−230
+35%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 110−120
−29.3%
150−160
+29.3%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 50−55
−30%
65−70
+30%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 160−170
−32.5%
220−230
+32.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 40
−25%
50−55
+25%
Metro Exodus 30−35
−29%
40−45
+29%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
−32.2%
230−240
+32.2%
Valorant 200−210
−35%
270−280
+35%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 65−70
−30.8%
85−90
+30.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−30.4%
30−33
+30.4%
Far Cry 5 52
−34.6%
70−75
+34.6%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
−33.3%
80−85
+33.3%
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27
−34.6%
35−40
+34.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 37
−35.1%
50−55
+35.1%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 55−60
−33.9%
75−80
+33.9%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−30.4%
30−33
+30.4%
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45
−27.9%
55−60
+27.9%
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16
−20%
18−20
+20%
Metro Exodus 20−22
−35%
27−30
+35%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
−28.6%
45−50
+28.6%
Valorant 130−140
−31.4%
180−190
+31.4%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 35−40
−25%
45−50
+25%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−30.4%
30−33
+30.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−20%
12−14
+20%
Dota 2 75−80
−29.9%
100−105
+29.9%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−29.6%
35−40
+29.6%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−34.1%
55−60
+34.1%
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16
−20%
18−20
+20%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
−20%
30−33
+20%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 24−27
−20%
30−33
+20%

This is how RTX 3050 6GB Mobile and Arc Pro B50 compete in popular games:

  • Arc Pro B50 is 36% faster in 1080p
  • Arc Pro B50 is 32% faster in 1440p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 21.71 29.82
Recency 6 January 2023 5 September 2025
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt 70 Watt

RTX 3050 6GB Mobile has 16.7% lower power consumption.

Arc Pro B50, on the other hand, has a 37.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 166.7% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 60% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc Pro B50 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Arc Pro B50 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile
Intel Arc Pro B50
Arc Pro B50

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 973 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Arc Pro B50 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile or Arc Pro B50, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.