Quadro T1000 vs GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile with Quadro T1000, including specs and performance data.

RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
2021
4 GB GDDR6, 60 Watt
23.61
+45.9%

RTX 3050 4GB Mobile outperforms T1000 by a considerable 46% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking230329
Place by popularity52not in top-100
Power efficiency28.1623.16
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGN20-P0TU117
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date11 May 2021 (3 years ago)27 May 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048no data
Core clock speed1238 MHz1395 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHz1455 MHz
Number of transistorsno data4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)60 Watt (35 - 80 Watt TGP)50 Watt

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed12000 MHz8000 MHz
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_212.0 (12_1)
OpenGLno data4.6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD63
+57.5%
40−45
−57.5%
1440p45
+50%
30−35
−50%
4K29
+61.1%
18−20
−61.1%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 42
+55.6%
27−30
−55.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 66
+46.7%
45−50
−46.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+50%
50−55
−50%
Counter-Strike 2 38
+58.3%
24−27
−58.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 46
+53.3%
30−33
−53.3%
Forza Horizon 4 115
+53.3%
75−80
−53.3%
Forza Horizon 5 80
+60%
50−55
−60%
Metro Exodus 83
+50.9%
55−60
−50.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 87
+58.2%
55−60
−58.2%
Valorant 133
+47.8%
90−95
−47.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+50%
50−55
−50%
Counter-Strike 2 30
+66.7%
18−20
−66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 37
+54.2%
24−27
−54.2%
Dota 2 96
+47.7%
65−70
−47.7%
Far Cry 5 73
+46%
50−55
−46%
Fortnite 120−130
+55%
80−85
−55%
Forza Horizon 4 94
+56.7%
60−65
−56.7%
Forza Horizon 5 65−70
+62.5%
40−45
−62.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 86
+56.4%
55−60
−56.4%
Metro Exodus 57
+62.9%
35−40
−62.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+55%
100−105
−55%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+54.3%
35−40
−54.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75−80
+58%
50−55
−58%
Valorant 68
+51.1%
45−50
−51.1%
World of Tanks 250−260
+50.6%
170−180
−50.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+50%
50−55
−50%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+50%
30−33
−50%
Cyberpunk 2077 31
+47.6%
21−24
−47.6%
Dota 2 112
+49.3%
75−80
−49.3%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+52%
50−55
−52%
Forza Horizon 4 81
+47.3%
55−60
−47.3%
Forza Horizon 5 55
+57.1%
35−40
−57.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+55%
100−105
−55%
Valorant 95−100
+50.8%
65−70
−50.8%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 48
+60%
30−33
−60%
Grand Theft Auto V 48
+60%
30−33
−60%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+59.1%
110−120
−59.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+64.3%
14−16
−64.3%
World of Tanks 160−170
+48.2%
110−120
−48.2%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+63.3%
30−33
−63.3%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+57.1%
14−16
−57.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 17
+70%
10−11
−70%
Far Cry 5 70−75
+57.8%
45−50
−57.8%
Forza Horizon 4 56
+60%
35−40
−60%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
+62.5%
24−27
−62.5%
Metro Exodus 52
+48.6%
35−40
−48.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+50%
24−27
−50%
Valorant 65−70
+46.7%
45−50
−46.7%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 20−22
+66.7%
12−14
−66.7%
Dota 2 44
+46.7%
30−33
−46.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 44
+46.7%
30−33
−46.7%
Metro Exodus 17
+70%
10−11
−70%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
+50%
50−55
−50%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 44
+46.7%
30−33
−46.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+62.5%
16−18
−62.5%
Counter-Strike 2 20−22
+66.7%
12−14
−66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 5
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Dota 2 62
+55%
40−45
−55%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+57.1%
21−24
−57.1%
Fortnite 30−33
+66.7%
18−20
−66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 34
+61.9%
21−24
−61.9%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24
+50%
14−16
−50%
Valorant 30−35
+52.4%
21−24
−52.4%

This is how RTX 3050 4GB Mobile and Quadro T1000 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is 58% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is 50% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is 61% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 23.61 16.18
Recency 11 May 2021 27 May 2019
Chip lithography 8 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt 50 Watt

RTX 3050 4GB Mobile has a 45.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 50% more advanced lithography process.

Quadro T1000, on the other hand, has 20% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro T1000 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is a notebook card while Quadro T1000 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
NVIDIA Quadro T1000
Quadro T1000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1423 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 427 votes

Rate Quadro T1000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.