GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile vs Quadro RTX 5000

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro RTX 5000 with GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile, including specs and performance data.

RTX 5000
2018
16 GB GDDR6, 230 Watt
41.25
+68%

RTX 5000 outperforms RTX 3050 4GB Mobile by an impressive 68% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking97229
Place by popularitynot in top-10052
Cost-effectiveness evaluation14.62no data
Power efficiency12.3728.23
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameTU104GN20-P0
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date13 August 2018 (6 years ago)11 May 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,299 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores30722048
Core clock speed1620 MHz1238 MHz
Boost clock speed1815 MHz1500 MHz
Number of transistors13,600 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)230 Watt60 Watt (35 - 80 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate348.5no data
Floating-point processing power11.15 TFLOPSno data
ROPs64no data
TMUs192no data
Tensor Cores384no data
Ray Tracing Cores48no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz12000 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-Cno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12_2
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131-
CUDA7.5-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD100−110
+56.3%
64
−56.3%
1440p75−80
+66.7%
45
−66.7%
4K45−50
+55.2%
29
−55.2%

Cost per frame, $

1080p22.99no data
1440p30.65no data
4K51.09no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 42
+0%
42
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 66
+0%
66
+0%
Elden Ring 51
+0%
51
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 38
+0%
38
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 46
+0%
46
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 115
+0%
115
+0%
Metro Exodus 83
+0%
83
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 87
+0%
87
+0%
Valorant 133
+0%
133
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 30
+0%
30
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 37
+0%
37
+0%
Dota 2 96
+0%
96
+0%
Elden Ring 86
+0%
86
+0%
Far Cry 5 73
+0%
73
+0%
Fortnite 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 94
+0%
94
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 86
+0%
86
+0%
Metro Exodus 57
+0%
57
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Valorant 68
+0%
68
+0%
World of Tanks 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 31
+0%
31
+0%
Dota 2 112
+0%
112
+0%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 81
+0%
81
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Valorant 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 48
+0%
48
+0%
Elden Ring 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 48
+0%
48
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
World of Tanks 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 17
+0%
17
+0%
Far Cry 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 56
+0%
56
+0%
Metro Exodus 52
+0%
52
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Valorant 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Dota 2 44
+0%
44
+0%
Elden Ring 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 44
+0%
44
+0%
Metro Exodus 17
+0%
17
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 44
+0%
44
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5
+0%
5
+0%
Dota 2 62
+0%
62
+0%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Fortnite 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 34
+0%
34
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

This is how RTX 5000 and RTX 3050 4GB Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 5000 is 56% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 5000 is 67% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 5000 is 55% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 41.25 24.55
Recency 13 August 2018 11 May 2021
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 230 Watt 60 Watt

RTX 5000 has a 68% higher aggregate performance score, and a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RTX 3050 4GB Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 50% more advanced lithography process, and 283.3% lower power consumption.

The Quadro RTX 5000 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro RTX 5000 is a workstation card while GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
Quadro RTX 5000
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 214 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 5000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1402 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.